Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another Software Patent That Should Be Tossed Out

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Delgarde
    replied
    Originally posted by bridgman View Post
    ...they went quietly and I didn't have to call security.
    More's the pity...

    Leave a comment:


  • Delgarde
    replied
    Originally posted by SystemCrasher View Post
    How the fuck one can patent binary partitioning of search area? This is freaking ancient technique used here and there!
    They're not patenting binary searches - they're patenting an application of binary search techniques to a specific problem domain. Which is still ridiculous, because there's a huge amount of prior art on this, but it's not quite as wide-reaching as you suggest.

    As to patents being tossed out - I'd suggest that the people who apply for these patents should also be tossed out... a tenth floor window will do nicely.

    Leave a comment:


  • droidhacker
    replied
    I think that some wannabe journalists should try NOT emulating apple by making like they invented something... this technique has been in use for as long as there have been means of tracking changes in source code.

    Leave a comment:


  • A Laggy Grunt
    replied
    Something tells me Michael's going to be sued for patent infringement. Typical lawyer logic?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tgui
    replied
    Originally posted by bridgman View Post
    In a previous life I had to chase a bunch of lawyers out of my office who were going around to everyone making Macintosh graphics and threatening to sue them for use of the Exclusive-Or operation in drawing the on-screen pointer. Yep, they had managed to obtain a patent for that.

    I happened to have a bunch of prior-art examples handy from my own work pre-dating their patent application, so they went quietly and I didn't have to call security.
    *eye twitch*

    Leave a comment:


  • bridgman
    replied
    Originally posted by SystemCrasher View Post
    How the fuck one can patent binary partitioning of search area? This is freaking ancient technique used here and there!
    In a previous life I had to chase a bunch of lawyers out of my office who were going around to everyone making Macintosh graphics and threatening to sue them for use of the Exclusive-Or operation in drawing the on-screen pointer. Yep, they had managed to obtain a patent for that.

    I happened to have a bunch of prior-art examples handy from my own work pre-dating their patent application, so they went quietly and I didn't have to call security.

    Leave a comment:


  • OneTimeShot
    replied
    Mozilla do this IIRC

    IIRC - Mozilla takes too long to build and test every check in, so they run every few hours and auto bisect if they hit a build break.

    They've done it for years.

    Leave a comment:


  • SystemCrasher
    replied
    They managed to patent binary partitioning?!

    How the fuck one can patent binary partitioning of search area? This is freaking ancient technique used here and there!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tgui
    replied
    Originally posted by VinceLe View Post
    Must.
    Refrain.
    From.
    Speaking.
    As.
    An.
    Ex-HP...

    Haaaard...
    I know the feeling. I'm an ex Sun employee. I was there in person when McNealy stated that Linux was the backyard living bumpkin cousin to Solaris and would never amount to anything important. I knew at that moment Sun was SOL... sigh... So much stupid and koolaid drinking at these companies.

    Leave a comment:


  • DeepDayze
    replied
    Originally posted by dimko View Post
    It was not used for bad purposes yet, but I agree, that generic pattents should not be granted at all.
    Generic patents are just too darn broad and open to the patent trolls.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X