Linus Torvalds Still Deciding Linux 3.20 vs. Linux 4.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67185

    Linus Torvalds Still Deciding Linux 3.20 vs. Linux 4.0

    Phoronix: Linus Torvalds Still Deciding Linux 3.20 vs. Linux 4.0

    Linus Torvalds is still deciding when to bump the kernel version to Linux 4.0...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • bitman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 239

    #2
    I dont understand why they use this versioning scheme if it does not fit the purpose. Why major version gets bumped if there are no big/breaking changes is beyond me. Confusing numbers is lame excuse... Since kernel development is incremental why dont they just adopt same version numbering like ff/chrome/systemd...

    Comment

    • dungeon
      Banned
      • Feb 2008
      • 7915

      #3
      Why not something radical like 5.4, 5.6, 5.8, 5.10, 6.0, 6.2... and so on

      Comment

      • magika
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 470

        #4
        Originally posted by dungeon View Post
        Why not something radical like 5.4, 5.6, 5.8, 5.10, 6.0, 6.2... and so on
        Or year.month which actually makes some sense.

        Comment

        • duby229
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2007
          • 7778

          #5
          Originally posted by bitman View Post
          I dont understand why they use this versioning scheme if it does not fit the purpose. Why major version gets bumped if there are no big/breaking changes is beyond me. Confusing numbers is lame excuse... Since kernel development is incremental why dont they just adopt same version numbering like ff/chrome/systemd...
          It does actually make sense if you think about like this.....

          Adding up all the changes between 3.0 and 3.20 accumulates to a ton of change. It's the accumulation of change that warrants the major version change.

          Comment

          • dungeon
            Banned
            • Feb 2008
            • 7915

            #6
            Originally posted by magika View Post
            Or year.month which actually makes some sense.
            Those are year.month, just shortenend... remember Linus does not like big numbers like 3.20 This way he will see big second number once or twice per year.
            Last edited by dungeon; 13 February 2015, 11:15 AM.

            Comment

            • bitman
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2014
              • 239

              #7
              Indeed year.month would make much more sense.

              Comment

              • dh04000
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2012
                • 892

                #8

                Comment

                • xeekei
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2012
                  • 870

                  #9
                  I voted 3.20. Let's make it 4.0 after 3.29.

                  Comment

                  • dungeon
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 7915

                    #10
                    @dh04000

                    Who cares, you asked? Egomaniac whose kernel carries his name

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X