If multiple bases were to be chosen, I, like many before me would have to agree with;
1: Debian; rolling or not, its entire existance is based around sanity and being stable.
2: openSuse; It's quite simply one of the most polished user experiences out there. Rich ecosystem of support
3: CentOS; Baseline for hte other camp for solid server/workstation OS and as posted previously, Fedora might be a little bit to picky to build for
4: Ubuntu LTS; Has to be done!
These are baselines and theoretically should not prove to many problems for a solid base to work from and supply real-world results.
Then go nuts with the likes of Arch, Fedora, Crunchbang, Mint, Chakra, PCLinuxOS, *BSD, et al.
Having a server host the installers across the network for any of these system's should make rapid deployment a breeze if preconfigured correctly. I believe I saw a post mby Michael once saying he does something like this anyway.
1: Debian; rolling or not, its entire existance is based around sanity and being stable.
2: openSuse; It's quite simply one of the most polished user experiences out there. Rich ecosystem of support
3: CentOS; Baseline for hte other camp for solid server/workstation OS and as posted previously, Fedora might be a little bit to picky to build for
4: Ubuntu LTS; Has to be done!
These are baselines and theoretically should not prove to many problems for a solid base to work from and supply real-world results.
Then go nuts with the likes of Arch, Fedora, Crunchbang, Mint, Chakra, PCLinuxOS, *BSD, et al.
Having a server host the installers across the network for any of these system's should make rapid deployment a breeze if preconfigured correctly. I believe I saw a post mby Michael once saying he does something like this anyway.
Comment