Linux vs Windows speed
I think that, in terms of speed, there's a difference between Windows and Linux. Linux seems to be faster. I found this information on weloveourhost.com/linux-windows.html Maybe you could read that page to get a better understanding of the differences between the 2 platforms. Good luck!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Windows vs Linux TAR files
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by d2kx View PostAFAIK this is due to ext4 vs NTFS. NTFS plain simply sucks on Windows. I haven't tried it myself, but I hear that this is the reason Minecraft has much faster loading times on Linux (many small files).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d2kx View PostAFAIK this is due to ext4 vs NTFS. NTFS plain simply sucks on Windows. I haven't tried it myself, but I hear that this is the reason Minecraft has much faster loading times on Linux (many small files).
Oh well I guess its another reason to tell my boss why we should be using linux.
Edit: I also tried using a RAM Drive application that made a virtual Fat32 disk drive in RAM and it was still very slow almost unchanged from the real disk drives.Last edited by timothyja; 27 February 2013, 07:54 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
AFAIK this is due to ext4 vs NTFS. NTFS plain simply sucks on Windows. I haven't tried it myself, but I hear that this is the reason Minecraft has much faster loading times on Linux (many small files).
Leave a comment:
-
Windows vs Linux TAR files
I'm not sure if Phoronix is the best place to ask this but here goes.
Can anyone explain to me why a 4MB tar file with around 2000 small files in it takes up to 12 seconds to extract in windows 7 64-bit (I have tried 7zip and the windows GNU Tar port ) on a Xeon 3Ghz 6 core, 12GB memory machine
And yet is almost instant on a Ubuntu Linux 64-bit machine with a Dual core AMD 3Ghz, 8GB ram.
Surely windows can't really be that bad at creating new files on the file system can it?Tags: None
Leave a comment: