"ok we set "36%" as the efficiency and then comes some arguments against it:
Wikipedia: "because of the fact its a very big power plant you need longer cables to the customers because of this you lost energy on the cables in germany they lost 6% of the energy on the cable net because of this"
"↑ Monatsbericht ?ber die Elektrizit?tsversorgung Statistischen Bundesamts, Wiesbaden, Stand 4. Quartal 2008"
oh you lost another 6% now we calculate 36% -6%= 33,84 now you only have 33,84
now comes the maintenance work and the heat goes not into electricity now what?
Another wikipedia argument:
the second german text: "The efficiency of the total system drops down because of the energy to build it and run it and the energy cost of the demolition of the nuclear power plant and the energy consuming of earning the uran.
and a last argumentation: you lost energy by radioactivity
now try it again.
but yes you don't understand the word "investment"
and statistic isn't valid until the end of the year this means we talk again on the end of the year.
(and again this isn't an argument its just cynicism again)