Bcachefs Changes Rejected Reportedly Due To CoC, Kernel Future "Uncertain"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • logical
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMightyBuzzard View Post

    By saying mean but true things? If you care more about feels than truth, we don't need you. And by "we" I mean both the Linux community and humanity as a whole.
    I see only a regard for mean things, true things, not so much. What you call "truth" is merely your opinion. I guess only your opinions should be considered "truth" by everyone and anyone who doesn't agree should just be removed.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMightyBuzzard
    replied
    Originally posted by clipcarl View Post

    I personally think that CoCs can and sometimes do provide a valuable tool that can contributes to the success of a software project. It is a well known and largely accepted fact that the behavior of certain individuals can be so off-putting that it causes others to not contribute.

    But you could also make the argument that the rules, implementation and enforcement of certain CoCs, such as in the case of the Linux kernel's CoC here, isn't as fair as it could be. If you did I wouldn't disagree with you.

    But the issue here isn't whether Kent or anyone else agrees with the CoC rules, it's Kent's seeming inability to follow any except those he wants to.

    To paraphrase someone wittier than I: We're trying to run a civilization here.
    No, you are trying to run someone else's project using their own compassion against them. If you genuinely want a huggy, feely project where everyone is nice to you, start one. I seriously doubt that you do though. In almost all cases you're simply trying to create yourself a tool to win heated debates that you're too weak to participate in.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMightyBuzzard
    replied
    Originally posted by logical View Post

    And you just reinforced the point I made about hate, what a shock.
    By saying mean but true things? If you care more about feels than truth, we don't need you. And by "we" I mean both the Linux community and humanity as a whole.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMightyBuzzard
    replied
    Originally posted by pmorph View Post
    If you have no respect for other peoples time (life), how do you expect them to care about your "free speech"?
    "Free as in speech" is the hardest community project of them all, without the will to co-operate it simply dies.
    Learn not to be an emotionally fragile little twerp then just like every other generation of humanity before you. We don't need your contributions if it comes with this much baggage.

    Leave a comment:


  • fotomar
    replied
    Originally posted by logical View Post

    My ilk? LOL, so imaginative. Not.
    I notice your attempt to deflect the actual question

    there’s a lot of noticing going on these days

    Leave a comment:


  • logical
    replied
    Originally posted by fotomar View Post
    Do you accuse me of some specific hate, or just “hate” in general, however you or your ilk may choose to define it today?

    And you obviously didn’t look up the words you didn’t understand
    My ilk? LOL, so imaginative. Not.

    Leave a comment:


  • fotomar
    replied
    Originally posted by logical View Post

    And you just reinforced the point I made about hate, what a shock.
    to be fair, you made no point

    Leave a comment:


  • logical
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMightyBuzzard View Post

    You're confused? Good if surprising. Most of you idiots don't have the self-awareness or intellectual honesty to be confused. When faced with the majority repudiating everything you believe, most of you just double down and call everyone who hates you for your atrocious behavior and extremely destructive ideas *ists.
    And you just reinforced the point I made about hate, what a shock.

    Leave a comment:


  • fotomar
    replied
    Originally posted by logical View Post

    So utterly self-assured in your hate are you? The classic justification of hate throughout history. How original. Remember that when the time comes that you're the object of a similar hate instead of the giver.
    Do you accuse me of some specific hate, or just “hate” in general, however you or your ilk may choose to define it today?

    And you obviously didn’t look up the words you didn’t understand

    Leave a comment:


  • logical
    replied
    Originally posted by fotomar View Post

    There is nothing wrong with hating the odious
    So utterly self-assured in your hate are you? The classic justification of hate throughout history. How original. Remember that when the time comes that you're the object of a similar hate instead of the giver.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X