The Linux foundation isn't upholding their CoC in virtually every other case, including when transgressions are by Linus himself. This CoC violation complaint is absurd to say the least, based on the quotes.
Bcachefs Changes Rejected Reportedly Due To CoC, Kernel Future "Uncertain"
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Daktyl198 View Post
Your first example is an example of voting by committee, just with extra steps. Your next two examples are censorship, not to mention pussyfooting around the problem. It's amazing that the "anti-woke" crowd has gone so far, they've wrapped right back around to censorship and not hurting people's feelings lmao.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Quackdoc View PostI love this thread so much, basically kent disagreed, michal said it was discused in a previous thread, kent asked for thread, michal said to find it himself, kent accused him of being insane because he again, couldn't find the thread and people refused to provide it, michal said kent was incapable of not being insane, kent told michal to get his head examined, shuah said the behavior is inexcusable (but saying kent is incapable of not being insane isn't)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by energyman View Post
People like Kent destroy projects. Nothing they do has any worth in the long run. His fs might be exciting and shiny. So what? Linux has plenty of exciting and shiny fs to pick from. Without some wannabe dictator like Kent screwing around in the background.
bcachefs is by and far the biggest development in Linux filesystems since Linux has existed.
It allows:
- Copy On Write
- Device Classes (Caching/Tiering)
- Erasure Coding
- Encryption
- Compression
Within a single filesystem. No need for MD or LVM underlays, no need for block layer caches. It does it all.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jonnyheggheim View Post
It's Linus project and he is free to do whatever he wants, but according to the CoC he is not allowed to discriminate by nationality. It is double standards when the CoC is used against Kent, but not against Linus.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jonnyheggheim View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JPFSanders View Post
You poison and derail every single thread you post in consistently and without fault, you ask about contributions but all you do is spew bile and lies whatever the subject is
Originally posted by skeevy420 View PostQUIT ATTACKING ME.
Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
Lets look at those "idiotic" and "arbitary" rules:
Don't insult someone
---------
---------
The ultimate irony is the CoC hall monitors are the ones who really stirred up drama that made Linux look bad by coming in after the adults had already sorted everything out.
This, and another interaction Kent had sounded like the Unhelpful Helper:
As we know maladaptive social signals are behaviors that can be witnessed by others in such a way that they keep us out of the tribe. In RO DBT social signals are posited as a unique and powerful mechanism of …
Do people honestly think that you can't handle bad actors without a CoC?
A CoC is not helpful.
For example, Alexmitter somehow managed to summarize the entire CoC with 3 words. I haven't checked but that's probably a better compression than zstd could achieve.
Comment
-
Comment