Originally posted by Uiop
View Post
Bcachefs Fixes Pull Once Again Frustrates Linus Torvalds - Two Choices Offered
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
I think you mixed something up here. You logically connected "a lot of people" with "big endian". Those two don't go together.
But as you most certainly read in the following discussion, they are discussing big endian ci. So it will get solved.
These build failures are impacting enough people that Torvalds is perfectly willing to rip out the whole filesystem.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostIn reality this entire thing is a diversion, what should really be discussed is why the flying fuck in 2024 (almost 2025), does Linux not have a nightly CI build against current in progress branch. This has been completely standard for open source projects for decades, and instead in their infinite wisdom Linux kernel dev's thought that offloading this to users wouldn't be problematic. My gosh.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
Learn to read. I said that the only systems with big endian are either decades old OR are mainframes.
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostIBM-z system is a mainframe, I don't think its realistic to expect Kent to dump hundreds of thousands, if not millions to buy a mainframe for his home but I could be wrong.
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostAnd when Linus wrote this filesystems, these processes didn't even exist something that Kent ironically pointed out to himLast edited by Daktyl198; 07 October 2024, 09:16 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
He didn't push patches with zero testing, stop spreading lies.
And before you start whining - again - about how you are fixing bugs, let me remind you about the build failures you had on big-endian machines because your patches had gotten ZERO testing outside your tree.
I was hoping and expecting that bcachefs being mainlined would actually help development. It has not. You're still basically the only developer, there's no real sign that that will change, and you seem to feel like sending me untested stuff that nobody else has ever seen the day before the next rc release is just fine.
So if this is just your project and nobody else is expected to participate, and you don't care about the fact that you break the mainline build, why the hell did you want to be in the mainline tree in the first place?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View PostAlready read this. Seems my understanding doesn't match yours
MM-devs NAKed, VFS-devs NAKed, the guy who says, he's the only one who knows right, pushed through his own tree. I'm reading fsdevel...
It's running for next and stable. But I forgot, bcachefs is so mature and stable and perfect, it doesn't need any stable-fixes.
As I said, we had this several times before. It's just another round with other player(s). Taking my popcorn and enjoy the show
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View Postedit2: Kent is "crucified" for offending others and not working together, ignoring change request over and over again.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Uiop View PostSo, we should kick Kent out of the Linux mainline because IBM isn't interested in his filesystem, and because IBM doesn't care about the rest of us, the peasants.
Excellent argument... it proves what I have been afraid of.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Uiop View Post
Also, I'm obviously not talking about IBM donating hardware to Kent.
I'm talking about IBM not donating their z-architecture for the Linux kernel test builds.
edit: Oh and btw. I would expect IBM is more interested in XFS today, as they own Red Hat now.
edit2: Kent is "crucified" for offending others and not working together, ignoring change request over and over again.Last edited by PuckPoltergeist; 07 October 2024, 03:56 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: