Bcachefs Fixes Pull Once Again Frustrates Linus Torvalds - Two Choices Offered

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PuckPoltergeist
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 474

    Originally posted by cb88 View Post

    Pissing on the guy in public doesn't exactly make people want to review his patches more either... this SHOULD have been a call to other interested developers to review Kent's patches more rather than lambasting him for what OTHER people are not doing.

    I mean what do you expect the guy to do let his fixes languish forever while your mainline kernel trots ahead...
    Why should somebody review code for getting pissed on for this?

    Comment

    • PuckPoltergeist
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 474

      Originally posted by Uiop View Post
      If it's such a popular system and IBM cares so much about the z-architecture and it's users, then why doesn't IBM donate their mainframe for Linux kernel test builds?

      You can't blame Kent for IBM not donating their system to be tested.
      You can bet there are mainframes for CI, just not for public. If IBM doesn't donate hardware to Kent, maybe they just aren't interested in bcachefs?

      Comment

      • cb88
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 1345

        Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View Post
        For what... All I'm seeing is some grump ad getting pissy over ML usage when they should have stopped using MLs a decade ago... And iterator vs recursive probably any half decent AI code transformer could rewrite that in 30sec...

        It's nearly 2025 and they are still hand formatting quotes....

        Comment

        • PuckPoltergeist
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 474

          Originally posted by cb88 View Post

          For what... All I'm seeing is some grump ad getting pissy over ML usage when they should have stopped using MLs a decade ago... And iterator vs recursive probably any half decent AI code transformer could rewrite that in 30sec...

          It's nearly 2025 and they are still hand formatting quotes....
          Oh yeah, offending others because of the process is a very good idea. Especially when the other person can't change anything of the process It's not a singularity, Kent seems to offend others whenever he can.

          And it doesn't matter if someone right as hell with technical issues. Offending somebody is the best way to not get anything changed

          Comment

          • PuckPoltergeist
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2009
            • 474

            Originally posted by Uiop View Post

            Also, I'm obviously not talking about IBM donating hardware to Kent.

            I'm talking about IBM not donating their z-architecture for the Linux kernel test builds.
            And I'm just addressing the part with the interests. Corporations spending money in things they are interested in. IBM is interested in Linux, obviously. If they are interested in bcachefs too, they would spent hardware for this. But they aren't, they are just interested in a very small niche. Most Linux users a irrelevant as fuck to them.

            edit: Oh and btw. I would expect IBM is more interested in XFS today, as they own Red Hat now.

            edit2: Kent is "crucified" for offending others and not working together, ignoring change request over and over again.
            Last edited by PuckPoltergeist; 07 October 2024, 03:56 PM.

            Comment

            • PuckPoltergeist
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 474

              Originally posted by Uiop View Post
              So, we should kick Kent out of the Linux mainline because IBM isn't interested in his filesystem, and because IBM doesn't care about the rest of us, the peasants.

              Excellent argument... it proves what I have been afraid of.
              That's what you said. Don't know, where you read this from?

              Comment

              • PuckPoltergeist
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2009
                • 474

                Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View Post
                edit2: Kent is "crucified" for offending others and not working together, ignoring change request over and over again.
                For the crucified-part:

                Comment

                • Errinwright
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2023
                  • 178

                  Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View Post
                  Already read this. Seems my understanding doesn't match yours


                  MM-devs NAKed, VFS-devs NAKed, the guy who says, he's the only one who knows right, pushed through his own tree. I'm reading fsdevel...


                  It's running for next and stable. But I forgot, bcachefs is so mature and stable and perfect, it doesn't need any stable-fixes.

                  As I said, we had this several times before. It's just another round with other player(s). Taking my popcorn and enjoy the show
                  Should perhaps re-read if that is your conclusion

                  Comment

                  • LockedPotato
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2022
                    • 47

                    Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post

                    He didn't push patches with zero testing, stop spreading lies.
                    I mean...

                    And before you start whining - again - about how you are fixing bugs, let me remind you about the build failures you had on big-endian machines because your patches had gotten ZERO testing outside your tree.

                    I was hoping and expecting that bcachefs being mainlined would actually help development. It has not. You're still basically the only developer, there's no real sign that that will change, and you seem to feel like sending me untested stuff that nobody else has ever seen the day before the next rc release is just fine.

                    So if this is just your project and nobody else is expected to participate, and you don't care about the fact that you break the mainline build, why the hell did you want to be in the mainline tree in the first place?
                    Literally read the article. Which seven mouth breathers liked your post?

                    Comment

                    • Daktyl198
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 1547

                      Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post

                      Learn to read. I said that the only systems with big endian are either decades old OR are mainframes.
                      Not in the vast majority of your comments. But pop off lol.

                      Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
                      IBM-z system is a mainframe, I don't think its realistic to expect Kent to dump hundreds of thousands, if not millions to buy a mainframe for his home but I could be wrong.​
                      Instead of having Kent buy a mainframe, how about he just stop touching code so far outside the reach of his filesystem that he's breaking builds on hardware he doesn't support or ever intend to support... and then submitting those changes the day before RC...

                      Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
                      And when Linus wrote this filesystems, these processes didn't even exist something that Kent ironically pointed out to him
                      Which has nothing to do with Kent's original taunt.
                      Last edited by Daktyl198; 07 October 2024, 09:16 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X