Originally posted by cb88
View Post
Bcachefs Fixes Pull Once Again Frustrates Linus Torvalds - Two Choices Offered
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Uiop View PostIf it's such a popular system and IBM cares so much about the z-architecture and it's users, then why doesn't IBM donate their mainframe for Linux kernel test builds?
You can't blame Kent for IBM not donating their system to be tested.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View Post
Why should somebody review code for getting pissed on for this?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/ivjo62ghagmcoacjdtoute7mzwkcj3gu6hgdygjry5x7uiqgid @6axrxbn5auvy/
It's nearly 2025 and they are still hand formatting quotes....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cb88 View Post
For what... All I'm seeing is some grump ad getting pissy over ML usage when they should have stopped using MLs a decade ago... And iterator vs recursive probably any half decent AI code transformer could rewrite that in 30sec...
It's nearly 2025 and they are still hand formatting quotes....
And it doesn't matter if someone right as hell with technical issues. Offending somebody is the best way to not get anything changed
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Uiop View Post
Also, I'm obviously not talking about IBM donating hardware to Kent.
I'm talking about IBM not donating their z-architecture for the Linux kernel test builds.
edit: Oh and btw. I would expect IBM is more interested in XFS today, as they own Red Hat now.
edit2: Kent is "crucified" for offending others and not working together, ignoring change request over and over again.Last edited by PuckPoltergeist; 07 October 2024, 03:56 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Uiop View PostSo, we should kick Kent out of the Linux mainline because IBM isn't interested in his filesystem, and because IBM doesn't care about the rest of us, the peasants.
Excellent argument... it proves what I have been afraid of.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View Postedit2: Kent is "crucified" for offending others and not working together, ignoring change request over and over again.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PuckPoltergeist View PostAlready read this. Seems my understanding doesn't match yours
MM-devs NAKed, VFS-devs NAKed, the guy who says, he's the only one who knows right, pushed through his own tree. I'm reading fsdevel...
It's running for next and stable. But I forgot, bcachefs is so mature and stable and perfect, it doesn't need any stable-fixes.
As I said, we had this several times before. It's just another round with other player(s). Taking my popcorn and enjoy the show
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
He didn't push patches with zero testing, stop spreading lies.
And before you start whining - again - about how you are fixing bugs, let me remind you about the build failures you had on big-endian machines because your patches had gotten ZERO testing outside your tree.
I was hoping and expecting that bcachefs being mainlined would actually help development. It has not. You're still basically the only developer, there's no real sign that that will change, and you seem to feel like sending me untested stuff that nobody else has ever seen the day before the next rc release is just fine.
So if this is just your project and nobody else is expected to participate, and you don't care about the fact that you break the mainline build, why the hell did you want to be in the mainline tree in the first place?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
Learn to read. I said that the only systems with big endian are either decades old OR are mainframes.
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostIBM-z system is a mainframe, I don't think its realistic to expect Kent to dump hundreds of thousands, if not millions to buy a mainframe for his home but I could be wrong.
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostAnd when Linus wrote this filesystems, these processes didn't even exist something that Kent ironically pointed out to himLast edited by Daktyl198; 07 October 2024, 09:16 PM.
Comment
-
Comment