Originally posted by SteamPunker
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Acquires Another AI Company To Expand Its Enterprise AI Solutions
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ol3geezer View Post
It's really a skill issue. America has all the talent, investment and resources and so it makes logical sense to incorporate the returns of that investment back into the mainland. It's not like EU would have any tech companies if it wasn't for the bedrock which America built and so EU should just appreciate the privilege of even having computers.
It does look like AMD is finally divesting from Linux: Silo OS. It was just a matter of time.
Finally? Another clueless anti-Linux troll? Silo OS stands for Silo Operating Software FYI.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by Volta View PostMost of the US talents came from Europe and US have computers thanks to Europeans. Not the other way around. If there were no USA sponsored WW2 the USA would be third world country.
The U.S. "sponsored" WWII?
It has nothing to do with Germany invading Poland in 1939, German war atrocities, Japan invading China in 1931, Japan attacking the U.S. in 1941, Italy attacking Greece in 1940?
Any of this ring a bell?
- Likes 2
Comment
-
This is another bad investment for AMD, one that continues the trend started when AMD bought ATI.
As i have stated, I follow what Wall Street analysts say because they are the people that deal with billions of dollars worth of investments and they look at companies from a financial perspective, not ideology or what they are a fan of.
The darling of Wall Street right now is NVIDIA, with many analysts predicting it can hit a market cap of 6 trillion by the end of the year.
According to analysts, NVIDIA controls between 70% and 95% of the market share of AI chips and some analysts have described their technology advantage as a moat.
What does this have to do with this acquisition?
When analysts model NVIDIA's growth and try to predict where they will be in 5, 10, 20, years, there is universal agreement that NVIDIA is likely to keep growing for the next decade or so but their biggest obstacle is not Intel or AMD, it's their own customers.
The one thing analysts say can derail NVIDIA's upward trend is companies like Oracle, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, all of whom are developing AI chips for internal use and these companies represent 40% of NVIDIA's revenue.
Other threats are Apple and Qualcomm, who are changing the way AI is processed.
The bottom line is AMD spent another 665 million in cash to buy this company to try and compete against NVIDIA, meanwhile NVIDIA is the Godzilla that will be facing other monsters in a few years and AMD is not going to be able to compete against NVIDIA, Qualcomm, et al with a paltry 665 million investment.
AMD should think smaller, target the gamer and entertainment industries with leading AI and graphics, let the other guys fight over the AI data center market, it's a bubble that will eventually burst, hopefully after I have cashed out, and go for the industries that are likely to be stable with lots of demand for decades to come.
Last edited by sophisticles; 10 July 2024, 01:34 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sophisticles View Post
Are you on drugs?
The U.S. "sponsored" WWII?
It has nothing to do with Germany invading Poland in 1939, German war atrocities, Japan invading China in 1931, Japan attacking the U.S. in 1941, Italy attacking Greece in 1940?
Any of this ring a bell?
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by sophisticles View PostThis is another bad investment for AMD, one that continues the trend started when AMD bought ATI.
As i have stated, I follow what Wall Street analysts say because they are the people that deal with billions of dollars worth of investments and they look at companies from a financial perspective, not ideology or what they are a fan of.
The darling of Wall Street right now is NVIDIA, with many analysts predicting it can hit a market cap of 6 trillion by the end of the year.
According to analysts, NVIDIA controls between 70% and 95% of the market share of AI chips and some analysts have described their technology advantage as a moat.
What does this have to do with this acquisition?
When analysts model NVIDIA's growth and try to predict where they will be in 5, 10, 20, years, there is universal agreement that NVIDIA is likely to keep growing for the next decade or so but their biggest obstacle is not Intel or AMD, it's their own customers.
The one thing analysts say can derail NVIDIA's upward trend is companies like Oracle, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, all of whom are developing AI chips for internal use and these companies represent 40% of NVIDIA's revenue.
Other threats are Apple and Qualcomm, who are changing the way AI is processed.
The bottom line is AMD spent another 665 million in cash to buy this company to try and compete against NVIDIA, meanwhile NVIDIA is the Godzilla that will be facing other monsters in a few years and AMD is not going to be able to compete against NVIDIA, Qualcomm, et al with a paltry 665 million investment.
AMD should think smaller, target the gamer and entertainment industries with leading AI and graphics, let the other guys fight over the AI data center market, it's a bubble that will eventually burst, hopefully after I have cashed out, and go for the industries that are likely to be stable with lots of demand for decades to come.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/02/nvid...petition-.html
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by sophisticles View PostAMD should think smaller, target the gamer and entertainment industries with leading AI and graphics, let the other guys fight over the AI data center market
In reality AMD should take any opportunity to gain any extra amount of market share in the datacenter/cloud and/or HPC, because these are radically more profitable markets than consumer market. Even having less than 10% in datacenter AI is easily worth the effort.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by sophisticles View PostAre you on drugs?
The U.S. "sponsored" WWII?
It has nothing to do with Germany invading Poland in 1939, German war atrocities, Japan invading China in 1931, Japan attacking the U.S. in 1941, Italy attacking Greece in 1940?
Any of this ring a bell?
Originally posted by sophisticles View PostThis is another bad investment for AMD, one that continues the trend started when AMD bought ATI.
Investments and revenues aren’t matching up for the generative artificial intelligence market making it possible that the sector will have to invent artificial general intelligence to justify current expenditures.
When analysts model NVIDIA's growth and try to predict where they will be in 5, 10, 20, years, there is universal agreement that NVIDIA is likely to keep growing for the next decade or so but their biggest obstacle is not Intel or AMD, it's their own customers.
Other threats are Apple and Qualcomm, who are changing the way AI is processed.
The bottom line is AMD spent another 665 million in cash to buy this company to try and compete against NVIDIA, meanwhile NVIDIA is the Godzilla that will be facing other monsters in a few years and AMD is not going to be able to compete against NVIDIA, Qualcomm, et al with a paltry 665 million investment.
AMD should think smaller, target the gamer and entertainment industries with leading AI and graphics, let the other guys fight over the AI data center market, it's a bubble that will eventually burst, hopefully after I have cashed out, and go for the industries that are likely to be stable with lots of demand for decades to come.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/02/nvid...petition-.htmlLast edited by Dukenukemx; 10 July 2024, 04:36 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by sophisticles View Post
Are you on drugs?
The U.S. "sponsored" WWII?
It has nothing to do with Germany invading Poland in 1939, German war atrocities, Japan invading China in 1931, Japan attacking the U.S. in 1941, Italy attacking Greece in 1940?
Any of this ring a bell?
Comment
-
Originally posted by drakonas777 View Post
Absolute nonsense. I mean I get it, you have stated pretty clearly that you have some financial relation to NVIDIA, so I understand why you post such garbage takes about AMD.
In reality AMD should take any opportunity to gain any extra amount of market share in the datacenter/cloud and/or HPC, because these are radically more profitable markets than consumer market. Even having less than 10% in datacenter AI is easily worth the effort.
AMD invested too late, but the AI bubble is going to last longer than cryptomoney.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment