Originally posted by ddriver
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GNU Jami Taranis Released For Free Software Conferencing, Peer-To-Peer Communication
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Terrablit View Post
Sounds even better for being a private citizen who shouldn't have to cope with multiple nervous, paranoid governments who believe that the only route to stability is control and surveillance.
[...]
Sadly, those areas really aren't as far away as we like to pretend.
Comment
-
Originally posted by er888kh View Post
Not really. On one end of spectrum, there are drug cartels and terrorists and similar advanced groups that have their own tooling, and will never take the risk of using anything digital if they had to do something important.
On the other hand, many criminals aren't smart enough to know what is good encryption and which app is privacy respecting. After all, they are criminals, not IT/security experts.
As a result such opensource projects are more useful to privacy conscious nerds, IT/security experts (and their friends and families), political dissidents and journalists. Though a small percentage of these projects may gain a bigger audience (think signal or jitsi) but not as often as in commercial projects.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by JPFSanders View PostThen let me tell you that the important criminals, those with a brain, those with power, operate perfectly on plain sight and don't require any encryption to communicate. Never needed it, besides many of them are in power and commit crimes with total impunity and with help by law enforcement.
Your idea of a criminal is that of what the media portrays as a criminal.
There are plenty of criminals who do not act with the sort of impunity that you describe, and they indeed inflict a great deal of harm. Traditional law enforcement isn't obsolete. Far from it.
With that being said, I think it's a general human trait to get lazy and desire for more powerful tools to make your job easier, and security/law enforcement is no different. They always decry these sorts of technologies, but that's to be expected when faced with any developments threatening to make one's job harder.
The tricky part is finding the right balance between privacy and security. Since I'm US-based, my thinking is rooted in the 4th Amendment and it doesn't ban search & seizure - only unreasonable ones. In that is recognition that, while precious and worthy of protection, the right to privacy is not absolute. What we ultimately need is a transparent and auditable system for invasions of privacy, so that proper oversight cannot be avoided or circumvented.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Volta View PostRather against it. Violating privacy, spying users is criminal activity.
Violating privacy is and should be criminal in certain cases, only. Your apparent lack of nuance is not constructive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steffo View PostNice, but I guess because of the peer-to-peer approach, it doesn't scale well for many users? Say you have a class room with 100 people; is this possible?
In our earlier posts about the Together and Maloya releases of Jami we mentioned our work on improving Jami's video conferencing platform. There have been even more changes to the video conferencing platform system then, including new features and bug fixes, with a lot more yet to come. So, let's
It doesn't appear to use the same swam-based technology as the core product, but I don't claim to know any more than I gleaned from skimming that page.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment