Originally posted by coder
View Post
The Gates foundation clearly does not use the money best, they pretent to help people and maybe here and there really help people in the process to push a own agenda:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%...tion#Criticism
Education programs: he wants to play dictator, dictate how policy has to change in education, "pro charter school" something that clearly makes the world worse, pro extreme capitalism. That is a political agenda therefor not just help people. Some studies indicate this policies caused harms (bigger class sizes is always bad... that's a known fact in education why would this idiots push for that, surely not to help childern).
"closing neighborhood schools" so closing schools is now something positive? Wtf? Having huge influence and people have no power by votes over your shit.... that sounds nice not like somebody that fights against democracy.
Global health Division:
They caused a brain drain in Afrika, "to much Bill Gates personal views", "group think" "grants are based on social connections (corruption, yes access is a form of corruption, that's why media lies nonstop to get access to politics), and ideological alliances.
He "favors the interests of large pharmaceutical and agribusiness (in which Gates invests) over the interests of the people of developing countries" (ohh that sounds familier with the recent case I brought up).
AGRA "the hidden goal is not to lift small farmers out of poverty, but to control them through dependence on profit-oriented international supply chains. Which if you are known for doing such scams with schools and free microsoft in the past, if you have such scams in your past, it's a very legitimate claim and the burden of proof that you don't just do the same again lies on you.
I don't accept this ohh if don't have extreme hard proof that in no way could be different or unintentional that we then must believe Gates is a good person if a person has a evil past, we don't trust them. Heck Bill Gates would not just trust a person that was a thief in the past and let him work with his money without building up trust maybe slowly if at all. So why should I be more generous as this evil POS?
I don't know about Modi to much in india... so I don't say something about this.
Poverty and education policy:
for fucks sake even with that education he advocates for more Microsoft software use in education, and because he still holds lots of money in microsoft shares, he even earns money by his. So there you have a direct link where he earns money from the foundation success, so if the foundation earns much money trough this vaccines they have not only more money but more influence and then can soft dictate or give for free (pay with money from the foundation for windows lisenses and make everyone there dependent from their horrible drug.
For fucks sake they even invest in private prison companies... yes of course he just wants to help by earning money with the modern slaves in american prison, torturing some folks... unbelievable, but yes he now is a good man... because while doing all this horrible stuff I can't proof that he means bad, he just happens to do horrible stuff because things are unintentional... give me a break, stop watching so much CNN, Gates was and is a horrible evil person.
And btw you mention Epstein, I did not accuse him of being dircetly involved in sex crimes, I don't do that to even my worst enemies without good proof, I ve seen enough of false allegations, but what I say is that he when Epstein was already named as this rapist and known for his crimes (surely not convicted or arrested, but it was publicly known) he still tried to get contact with him, for his stupid Nobel Price, so he was willing to work with I Sex trafficker to get a Nobel price, that is I think in english called circumcisional evidence, federal prosecutors accused Epstein of sex trafficking of dozens of minors between 2002 and 2005 then in 2007 he gone to prison for 13 months for such charges, in Dezember 2018 he had a new lawsuit with several of his victims.
He even was forced to get ouf of microsoft because he had a affair with a staffer and asked people out, morally I personally find it stupid to have such rules and I don't judge him for that, but what I do is see that other people see him as sexual abuser or moral bankrupt person for that things, that he got shamed and forced out, so him getting this nobel price would overshine all the shaming so it's not only ego but to shut up his critiqus.
I sadly don't find when he had last time contact with Jeffry but first time was after he was a convicted sex criminal.
Comment