Originally posted by andre30correia
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Red Hat Is Hiring Even More Graphics Engineers
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by WalterCool View Post
Not really, OpenSource and Capitalism are okay, the problem with RedHat is how much influence they have in opensource projects. They have too much power in certain groups... like Gnome.
Same goes for Microsoft/Redhat/Intel on Linux.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dekernel View PostHeck, even Linus apparently doesn't have issues with it, and his opinion brings far more weight than guys like you.
Linus Torvalds on why desktop Linux sucks - YouTube
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lu_tze View Post
"Czechia" and "Česko" are considered derogatory. So if you want to insult people, go ahead.
The rest of us will continue calling it Czech Republic / Česká republika, despite the inconvenience (oh noes!) of being longer.
Ministerstvo zahraničních věcí ČR doplní jednoslovný název České republiky „Česko“ v cizích jazycích do dvou jmenných
Jde o: Czechia (ang.), Tchéquie (fr.), Chequia (šp.), Чехия (rus.) a dále v arabštině a čínštině.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lu_tze View Post
"Czechia" and "Česko" are considered derogatory. So if you want to insult people, go ahead.
The rest of us will continue calling it Czech Republic / Česká republika, despite the inconvenience (oh noes!) of being longer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Black_Fox View Post
Just like the "Republic of Poland" (official full name) is referred to as Poland (usual short form) in most contexts, in the same way the "Czech Republic" is Czechia. Or the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" is United Kingdom, if you really want me to illustrate the pointlessness of using the long-form official names in day-to-day talk.
The rest of us will continue calling it Czech Republic / Česká republika, despite the inconvenience (oh noes!) of being longer.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jacob View Post
Except they really do. Of course if what you expect is something that looks and behaves like a classic unix system then for sure, using it as such today is not as easy as it once was and will only become harder and harder as the OS moves further down the path that the major players including (but by no means only) RedHat are driving. If on the other hand you accept to look at Linux as an OS on its own and don't expect it to always mimic something else, then the progress towards user friendliness and Just Working that has been accomplished is truly remarkable.
If it were not for other players and their pragmatism to rock the RH boat and have them remember what users actually want, Linux usage would fall down to (even more) negligible point percentages. If other players had RH financial means, I believe the ease of use would have improved tenfold.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
Open Source != communism
Doesn't the GPL (and most open-source software licenses in general) allow for commercial use of the software? (e.g. selling copies of binaries/code)
....and those people earn money to live (98% of people require money to survive pretty much).
If Linux was exclusively a hobby unpaid project, where is the incentive?
I bet our graphics cards wouldn't have even worked under it if we did not have companies working for open-source.
I hope you are kidding now. Let me tell you that systemd makes it super easy to set my server up and running.
Sure, bash scripts may look simpler, but then when you have to handle a lot... *insert sounds of a collapsing attic*
Do you really see this as a disadvantage?
If it was very "l33t" I don't think you would have seen Wine or Steam on Linux, and it would cause Linux to have an even lower usage share on desktop.
Also, I think you forgot about Canonical/Ubuntu... (they were the pioneers of user-friendly Linux)
suckless = exchanging usability for simplicity
Did you just run out of reasons to call Red Hat evil? ;p
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jacob View Post
Yeah but see, you don't understand. Here are the fundamental reasons why Red Hat is the devil, as seen on various forums. I'm not making up any of them:[*]RH is evil because it's a corporation. Open Source ought to be anticapitalist.
Doesn't the GPL (and most open-source software licenses in general) allow for commercial use of the software? (e.g. selling copies of binaries/code)
Originally posted by jacob View Post[*]RH is evil because it employs people to work full time on FOSS software. Only spare time hobbyist coders should be allowed to touch it.
If Linux was exclusively a hobby unpaid project, where is the incentive?
I bet our graphics cards wouldn't have even worked under it if we did not have companies working for open-source.
Originally posted by jacob View Post[*]RH is evil because systemd/wayland/dbus/not-unix. Linux must not be allowed to innovate or break ranks with Unices. Any use case should be addressed exclusively using vigrepsedawk, or not at all.
Sure, bash scripts may look simpler, but then when you have to handle a lot... *insert sounds of a collapsing attic*
Originally posted by jacob View Post[*]RH is evil because it makes Linux easy to use and not l33t enough.
If it was very "l33t" I don't think you would have seen Wine or Steam on Linux, and it would cause Linux to have an even lower usage share on desktop.
Also, I think you forgot about Canonical/Ubuntu... (they were the pioneers of user-friendly Linux)
Originally posted by jacob View Post[*]RH is evil because it makes it harder for me to get my crappy buggy minimal suckless window manager to be taken seriously
Originally posted by jacob View Post[*]RH is evil because reasons.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostRed Hat could just as easily have leeched on other operating systems. It still would not have made them a company many people would want to engage with.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: