Maybe it is time to donate to people created the software we are using daily. In the down turn of market, it is much harder for free software developers to survive. We don't want to see things happens like Firefox disappears.
It should be possible to add an option to collect some donation when a software has been used for several months.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mozilla Laying Off Around A Quarter Of Their Employees
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Flaburgan View PostI don't get your argument, when you install packages on your computer, you get the binary and that's fine. Maybe you would like to improve WebAssembly by asking for the sources at the same time at the binary, but that doesn't make it "broken by design", or every compiled software would be broken...
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostSorry, I didn't mean to say Poland is great. I only meant that it is better in a relative way.
Otherwise Poland is somewhere down there with Bulgaria and Romania, which is not all that great, relatively speaking.Last edited by krOoze; 12 August 2020, 12:09 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flaburgan View PostI always wondered why so many people / project use webkit and not gecko when they need a webengine. In your case, is it only because that's what QtWebEngine uses?
My attempt at a custom web browser was mostly just because I ran into some example code in Qt that looked easy to customize (an assumption that later turned out to be false, thanks to Google's back-handed engineering upstream).
Originally posted by Flaburgan View PostDid you consider using Gecko or Servo?
If anything, I'm somewhat inclined to try using WebKit, since there are a few third party attempts at keeping Qt WebKit alive. Hopefully WebKit isn't likely to have Google pushing dubious "security" features and bloat into it upstream.
Of course, data wise, it might be cheapest just to start diff-ing the Qt Web Engine source code from Qt 5.14 and the prior known good source code to find what Google changed (I already have copies of said source code from downloading Qt source). Given the difficulty it takes to compile though, I haven't been super excited to invest the effort yet.Last edited by ed31337; 12 August 2020, 11:59 AM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ssokolow View Post
Of course, none can touch the ecosystem/featureset of Firefox or Chrome.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by krOoze View PostHow did you even say that with a straight face.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flaburgan View Post
I always wondered why so many people / project use webkit and not gecko when they need a webengine. In your case, is it only because that's what QtWebEngine uses? Did you consider using Gecko or Servo?
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
To US-centric, relaying to much on some big businesses located in US, at the mercy of Google or something.
But what the heck it opens sourceanyone in the world can pickup and continue from where they left.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flaburgan View Post
I always wondered why so many people / project use webkit and not gecko when they need a webengine. In your case, is it only because that's what QtWebEngine uses? Did you consider using Gecko or Servo?
Meanwhile, Blink can be used in a lot of browsers and qtwebengine can be used in a lot more applications.
Facts, it is harder to build a browser based on Gecko nowadays : http://conkeror.org/Alternatives
Mozilla is not an alternative to Google anymore. I would even say that, under the pretense of being an alternative, they are detrimental to the fight against Google. All they are doing is draining down hopes and efforts toward this goal.
Just look at what Mozilla has accomplished the past 10 years if not making Firefox a clone of Chromium and killing off everything that made its success...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: