Originally posted by birdie
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Latest Pango + HarfBuzz Is Leading To A Messy Font Rendering Situation For Some
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by coder View PostOther distros don't have to take the updates. If a fork of Pango without these changes becomes predominant, then maybe the trunk could become irrelevant.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
"That's what we decided not to support anymore. You can try to get used to the "blurry" rendering. Or you can find something else to use, or whatever. You are using Free Software you realize, right?"
Code:shiba ~ > equery list pango * Searching for pango ... [IP-] [ ] x11-libs/pango-1.42.4-r2:0
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by stormcrow View Post
Not any more. Attitudes like this is what pushed me back to Microsoft Windows & Apple on the desktop/mobile. I have work to do, don't have time coddling toxic free software egos that break or remove significant compatibility features simply because their narrow personal use doesn't include it.
The only thing I use free software for any more is file servers where the software stack is significantly smaller and generally backed up with support dollars.
There's no hinting on Apple platforms, and also no subpixel rendering for several releases already. You are supposed to purchase a device with a Retina display... i.e. exactly what the Pango developer said.
- Likes 29
Comment
-
Originally posted by lu_tze View Post
That's fine, just don't be surprised when you find out, that the proprietary platforms take even more hardcore position.
There's no hinting on Apple platforms, and also no subpixel rendering for several releases already. You are supposed to purchase a device with a Retina display... i.e. exactly what the Pango developer said.
The question is: has anyone noticed anything exceptionally relevant, absolutely necessary and brand new in Pango 1.44? No one that I know of. So, why go all the way to remove something which gave near perfect results and replace it with something which now requires the user to ... purchase a high DPI monitor not to bleed from their eyes?
- Likes 12
Comment
-
I know this is an extremely unpopular opinion around extremely "1337" (Arch et al.) users around here, but if there is one distro & one related company in the Linux world that has greatly cared about proper font rendering "out-of-the-box" since the very inception, it is:
UBUNTU by CANONICAL (c)
And well, only they can be trusted to stand up against this non-sense once & for all!
GO GO Power Shuttleworth! (cue >>Power Rangers<< tune here!)
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by Linuxxx View PostI know this is an extremely unpopular opinion around extremely "1337" (Arch et al.) users around here, but if there is one distro & one related company in the Linux world that has greatly cared about proper font rendering "out-of-the-box" since the very inception, it is:
UBUNTU by CANONICAL (c)
And well, only they can be trusted to stand up against this non-sense once & for all!
GO GO Power Shuttleworth! (cue >>Power Rangers<< tune here!)
- Likes 17
Comment
-
Originally posted by birdie View PostMaybe. It's the second time in a row that Gnome/RH developers mandate the usage of high DPI screens with Linux moving forward. This time however they leave us with no options at all, except sticking to older distros where the old font stack is still present.
Remember the world is in constant change and all we can do is adapt.
- Likes 13
Comment
-
hintfull with lcdlegacy? Seriously? Oh, nevermind, that's birdie.
I've tried other hinting styles but only hintfull satisfies me as it looks very close to ClearType v2 in Windows 7 which in my opinion has the best font rendering out of any implementations.Last edited by angrypie; 09 May 2020, 04:34 PM.
- Likes 10
Comment
Comment