Former Linux Developer Hans Reiser To Remain Locked Up
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by zyxxel View PostHow exactly the murder would be the reason for the file system creation.
The File System creation was the principal reason for Hans to Slaughter is wife..
I sugest you read this, again..
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by tuxd3v View Post
Nope, they are the root of the problem, if you care to read, take some time and read this:
So - here is the source code. Take your time and read it and inform us...
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tr...er/fs/reiserfs
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by zyxxel View PostNo, it isn't. It's a misrepresentation of two separate events that you have merged together as related.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by tuxd3v View PostMy claim?
They are facts..
You wouldn't successfully get through any course on mathematical logic using your twisted and convoluted ways of refining reality.
Lots of murders happens when fighting for the custody of children or how to handle a divorce. That doesn't mean that lots of people have automatically produced unethical products on their job - even if job stress might have been the initial cause for the divorce.
Isn't it time you start to actually think about this problem - really think - before you continue on this failed path? Right now, you aren't interested in listening to alternative descriptions because you have locked yourself into your view and aren't willing to consider if the view might actually be wrong. Maturity is the ability/willingness to reevaluate and admit that the original view might not really have been correct.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by tuxd3v View PostSorry but in my country prisoners are not slaves..
The problem is that the product is the base of a cold blood murder..you can't separate both since its the cause of all problems..
It was because of it, that the problems started and in the end, a Female was killed.. how can you separate that?
Your claim, is that Hans Reiser had to murder to produce the file system. So how many murders did it take per 1000 lines of produced code?
He worked a lot and was traveling a lot. Which was claimed to be the main reason for the divorce. But that goes for millions of other divorces. So you still can't claim that the file system implementation is drenched in blood just because too much work resulted in a divorce that then later resulted in a murder.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by zyxxel View PostOr maybe built the roads you need to get to/from work everyday or the power lines needed to supply your home with electricity.
Originally posted by zyxxel View PostAs already noted earlier - it's a different thing if the product itself is the creation based on a crime or perceived crime.
It was because of it, that the problems started and in the end, a Female was killed.. how can you separate that?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by tuxd3v View Post
because it happens that ReiserFS and a murder are deeply connected events,
They are not splitted or separated incidents, they are very closed related..besides I don't want to have anything to do with criminal code developed by that monster..
I like the family protection and safe model, not the murderous one..
"tell me with who you usually agreed, and I will tell you who you are.." this sentence for me is enough..
As already noted earlier - it's a different thing if the product itself is the creation based on a crime or perceived crime. Like how people explicitly avoids using make-up that has been tested on animals. Or medicine etc invented by forcibly testing on prisoners. This really is a very important distinction.
If you fail to separate produced work with person, then I don't think there is any way saving you. Then all this thread will ever be is lots of irrelevant poo.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by microcode View PostHuh? If English is your second language I get not understanding "exploit", though this is all gobbledygook. You seem to be saying that you just sorta believe whatever feels comfortable and expedient. What is wrong with benefitting from unrelated actions of somebody who also happened to, completely separately, do something heinous which was unforeseen and is no longer a danger? It's not like using ReiserFS causes murder or something.
They are not splitted or separated incidents, they are very closed related..besides I don't want to have anything to do with criminal code developed by that monster..
I like the family protection and safe model, not the murderous one..
"tell me with who you usually agreed, and I will tell you who you are.." this sentence for me is enough..
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: