Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNU Project Developers Debate A Restructuring As A "Bottom Up" Organization

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • andyprough
    replied
    RedHat couldn't wait to pounce on RMS. This is my shocked face.

    Leave a comment:


  • kpedersen
    replied
    Originally posted by Emmanuel Deloget View Post
    This may work in the long run, but it looks like an incredible waste of time.
    That is exactly what these people are. A match made in heaven

    Leave a comment:


  • Emmanuel Deloget
    replied
    Originally posted by Redfoxmoon View Post
    If you don't like it, leave. Go make your own shit. I say.
    This mostly means that all related GNU code has to be forked (and renamed), since most GNU projects are (c) the GNU foundation. This may work in the long run, but it looks like an incredible waste of time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redfoxmoon
    replied
    If you don't like it, leave. Go make your own shit. I say.

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    You know, that shouldn't happen. Richard Stallman should always stay at the top of the project, and not be influenced by those who want to insert politics into code!

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    This move is likely to cause any real change with RMS still at the helm,
    Sorry?

    Leave a comment:


  • GNU Project Developers Debate A Restructuring As A "Bottom Up" Organization

    Phoronix: GNU Project Developers Debate A Restructuring As A "Bottom Up" Organization

    GNU developers unhappy with Richard Stallman sticking around as head of the GNU Project and not planning to make any "radical" changes are now expressing their desire for the GNU to be restructured as a "bottom-up" organization whereby those active developers and volunteers involved could potentially have more say...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...om-Up-Proposed
Working...
X