Originally posted by 144Hz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canonical Is At Around 437 Employees, Pulled In $99M While Still Operating At A Loss
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by msotirovStocks don't work that way. Shareholders don't get shit as long as they don't sell their stocks. Technically Red Hat can use the money to invest in buying Canonical if they want to.
Originally posted by jacob View Post
Frankly I don't get this obsession with Canonical's CLAs. They only ever come into play if you want your code to be merged by Canonical. You can still develop patches, fork, maintain your own version etc. without having to worry about a single CLA.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
What would Red Hat gain from offering different types of kernels?
- Likes 2
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by msotirovNot all of them, Red Hat is still a publicly traded company. Technically 51% of shareholders must have sold to IBM for the takeover to be valid.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Britoid View Post
What would Red Hat gain from offering different types of kernels?
You know, gamers, content creators, users who like to scroll websites without constant stutter; basically standard desktop users!
All things RedHat obviously doesn't care about...
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
How about offering people who care about latency an appropiate kernel?
You know, gamers, content creators, users who like to scroll websites without constant stutter; basically standard desktop users!
All things RedHat obviously doesn't care about...
- Likes 3
Comment
-
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Britoid View Post
If that's not possible in the normal kernel then that's a bug that should be fixed, not worked around.
Basically, some things are in the normal kernel and it's on the distribution on whether they provide kernels with the dials turned to desktop and low-latency or if the users have to turn the dials themselves. Manjaro and Ubuntu are pretty good in that regard.
Comment
Comment