I don't get why people would want Arch that's not Arch. Arch is easy to install (takes 20 minutes tops), and yes it has an installer, what else would you call pacstrap?
With Debian, I get why you would want Ubuntu, because Debian stable is very old. But with Arch, everything is fresh, and what gets broken (in packages) is usually fixed in 1-2 hours, at most a day. Using Arch-based distros just gives you less fresh repos.
With Debian, I get why you would want Ubuntu, because Debian stable is very old. But with Arch, everything is fresh, and what gets broken (in packages) is usually fixed in 1-2 hours, at most a day. Using Arch-based distros just gives you less fresh repos.
Comment