AFS For Linux 5.1 Would Have Pleased Firefox/SQLite But Was Rejected As Untested Crap

[fuzz]

This is why CoC is necessary, to prevent people like you ruining both the mental state of colleagues and your entire workplaces productivity.

Just admit it, not all people are created equal and some need to be corrected even against their will.

/sarcasm.

Pffft, yeah sure. You just act strong on teh internets when you aren't risking anything. Filthy casul.

It will decrese ALL interactions, even the ones with people "worth your time". So yeah, unless you are Dr House it's a stupid strategy. And I know you aren't House.

Well, you don't know what lengths I would go to back in the day to mess with one kid, I'd continue pissing him off while he beat crap out of me, and I haven't even resisted it. As for reduced interactions, it works well for me. Overwhelming majority (>99%) of people simply aren't worth talking to.

[starshipeleven]

I tend to shit talk people IRL, even as they're trying to beat the crap out of me.

Pffft, yeah sure. You just act strong on teh internets when you aren't risking anything. Filthy casul.

Acting like that reduces the amount of interactions with people who aren't worth your time.

It will decrese ALL interactions, even the ones with people "worth your time". So yeah, unless you are Dr House it's a stupid strategy. And I know you aren't House.

[Brisse]

I tend to shit talk people IRL, even as they're trying to beat the crap out of me. Acting like that reduces the amount of interactions with people who aren't worth your time.

Then you are a psychopath and clearly not worth anyone else's time. You are the type of person that destroys work environments so that productivity plummets into an abyss. This is why CoC is necessary, to prevent people like you ruining both the mental state of colleagues and your entire workplaces productivity.

Try telling random people that piss you off that they should have been retroactively aborted and see how long you last before someone (rightfully) smashes your fuckface in.

I tend to shit talk people IRL, even as they're trying to beat the crap out of me. Acting like that reduces the amount of interactions with people who aren't worth your time.

[starshipeleven]

I think the point would go across better if he suggested that people who wrote these patches should be retroactively aborted. His attitude back in the day built a meritocratic community, where you could just tell what you think.

Try telling random people that piss you off that they should have been retroactively aborted and see how long you last before someone (rightfully) smashes your fuckface in.

I think the point would go across better if he suggested that people who wrote these patches should be retroactively aborted. His attitude back in the day built a meritocratic community, where you could just tell what you think.

I wonder whether CoC could get Torvalds banned if he breached it.

[cybertraveler]

I saw someday code that's using variables, functions etc. from another shared lib. Could someone explain me how this was done? Thanks

Simply put: When the "code" (program) is started, it gets linked together with the shared libraries it needs by the operating system. The code can then access the features (variables & functions etc) from that shared library.

You can find shared libraries on GNU/Linux here: /usr/lib/

[mike456]

I saw someday code that's using variables, functions etc. from another shared lib. Could someone explain me how this was done? Thanks

[PuckPoltergeist]

Well I don't know the part of the code Linus rejected, but an "uninitialized" warning doesn't always mean the code is buggy:

So why don't you inspect the code that is criticized? Most kernel devs are aware of false positives and silence those. So if Linus writes "And yes, it's _trivially_ and obviously uninitialized.", he's pretty sure it is.