Originally posted by Danny3
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fedora Planning A Per-System Unique Identifier For DNF To Count Users
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostDefine "western" as this isn't a thing in the EU afaik.
(Which is important because, even if you have an ISP that offers IPv6 without having to get an HE.net tunnel set up, they likely sent you a model of modem-router combo that functions like garbage if you have it in routed mode like most customers and enable IPv6 support.)Last edited by ssokolow; 08 January 2019, 07:31 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ssokolow View Post
Western Hemisphere... as in "Here in North America, we allocated ourselves a larger slice of IPv4 addresses relative to our population before they ran out, so our ISPs are under less pressure to implement carrier-grade NAT and can generally still hand out one-per-account DHCP leases that let you keep the same IP for as long as you leave your DSL/Cable modem running without interruption.
(Which is important because, even if you have an ISP that offers IPv6 without having to get an HE.net tunnel set up, they likely sent you a model of modem-router combo that functions like garbage if you have it in routed mode like most customers and enable IPv6 support.)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostIts a flawed idea and they know it. Quick disposable VMs / containers are going to generate a new UUID and false count a new user.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I'm getting a kick out of all the UUID hate. We don't know how they're going to come up with their UUIDs to know if they're using a method that can be tracked to an individual user.
Y'all would get a kick out of my UUIDs. I do stuff like a1000000-a100-a100-a100-a10000000000 for the first disk in a raid, a2blah-blah becomes the next disk, etc....it makes for easier tab completion.....and remembering passwords.....like, I can use "Horse Battery Staple, a1." for the first disk, "Horse Battery Staple, a2." for the 2nd (complete with commas and periods).
Comment
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostIts a flawed idea and they know it. Quick disposable VMs / containers are going to generate a new UUID and false count a new user.
But RedHat know this, they want to start exerting control like all the other crooks.
At most, debians opt-in Pop-con (Popularity Contest) is as far as I will ever trust. And even then I always opt out.
Will be fun watching Fedora fizzle out (Like Ubuntu) whilst blaming "user-interest" rather than their own arrogance.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by M@GOid View PostHehe. Imagine if Canonical made a announcement like this, using the exact same words...
But they won't do it. They prefer to make BS user numbers up, just like they only make CLA'ed software they can sell proprietary licenses for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SofS View Post
There is in that this will be information that is going to be transmitted elsewhere. Your example is local.
More importantly there is no connection between _you_ and this UUID so exactly what good is it to a possible attacker to "aha now we have fetched this magic id of '2ff1e0ff-3200-4cfb-a38b-fce9f1eb97c1' from zee interwebs!!!".
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostHow is IP address personal? What ISP aren't aggregating and NATting many users behind the same dynamic IP in 2019?
Comment
Comment