Tweet
bregma Ai verification is about understanding why an ai does something . To understand whether is a good enough way to reach the goal or if it is based on unrealiable assumptions that make it seem like its fullfiling its job competently . Not mostly about whether it fits certain expectations , its says so much in the tittle of the video i shared.
Most ai systems ( of public interest , the kind that are featured on two minute papers at least ) and many of their datasets are by an large open sourced by their creators nowadays to lift help from the common public onto those projects , instead of them creating their own re implementations ; which still happens most of the time code is not released.
By how much your arguments are unsound , i would say ( not an affirmation , just stating what happens to people with your line of thinking ) you are probably confusing having ideas refutted or being called out on the mob mentality of your group , with denial and being unfairly dismissed .
Eg : Even if was true that the way science is currently done is deeply maimed by personal biases and that outreachy can help solve that ( you have backed up neither statement ) . Then that would not still not mean that events like outreachy are worth pursuing . Doing so for that purpose would ammount to trying fighting biases of one kind with others ; instead of improving knowledge through actual methods that eliminate incorrect or fraudulent ideas , like the engineering design process , the scientific method or deconstruction through formal logic
Regarding what i mean with subversive mob mentality making people to not use use logic : recap , the last one ; both the video and comment section show examples
Most ai systems ( of public interest , the kind that are featured on two minute papers at least ) and many of their datasets are by an large open sourced by their creators nowadays to lift help from the common public onto those projects , instead of them creating their own re implementations ; which still happens most of the time code is not released.
By how much your arguments are unsound , i would say ( not an affirmation , just stating what happens to people with your line of thinking ) you are probably confusing having ideas refutted or being called out on the mob mentality of your group , with denial and being unfairly dismissed .
Eg : Even if was true that the way science is currently done is deeply maimed by personal biases and that outreachy can help solve that ( you have backed up neither statement ) . Then that would not still not mean that events like outreachy are worth pursuing . Doing so for that purpose would ammount to trying fighting biases of one kind with others ; instead of improving knowledge through actual methods that eliminate incorrect or fraudulent ideas , like the engineering design process , the scientific method or deconstruction through formal logic
Regarding what i mean with subversive mob mentality making people to not use use logic : recap , the last one ; both the video and comment section show examples
Comment