Originally posted by carewolf
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
An Important GNOME Performance Fix Has Landed
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by Brisse View Post"With this fix, the median frame-time drops from 16.97ms to 12.97ms."
Seems insanely high for just rendering the desktop.
A web-browser can easily run in 60FPS and seem perfectly smooth, eventhough the content it is showing would take almost a second to render from scratch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wagaf View PostThat's approx. going from 60 FPS to 77 FPS, which is very slow for just the desktop on a modern development machine.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by RealNC View PostIs this the reason why Gnome runs like absolute horse manure on my 144Hz display? I tried Gnome a month or so ago, just out of curiosity, and OH MY GOD does it run like crap. Stutter-fest :-/
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Creak View Post
I think 60 FPS is more than enough for a desktop rendering. Of course, it *could* be better, and probably should as well, but not *at all cost*: everything needs to be prioritized at some point. As long as the desktop is around 60FPS, I'm not sure optimization is the highest concern for a desktop environment. I'm not sure a user would see much difference between 60 FPS and 30 FPS on a classic desktop use. Maybe during animations...
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Creak View PostModifying the layout can have an impact on all the children and all the ancestors widgets (e.g. if the size of the time text changed, then the date widget position has to be recalculate in order to still be centered, and if the height changed as well, then all the whole top-bar will need to adapt and all the maximized windows will need to adapt because of it).
Comment
Comment