Originally posted by debianxfce
View Post
First of all: viruses don't exist on Linux? Whether or not that's true, viruses are not the only type of malicious software that exists on computers... and yes, malware does exist for Linux, and no, Linux is not free of attack vectors. XOrg introduces unnecessary attack vectors which cannot be always easily solved. Wayland is built this way from the ground up with security and simplicity. I have not personally looked into the XOrg source code myself, but I'm told its become a horrid un-maintainable mess (not my words).
Second: 4G/3G networks do not have attackers? Ha that's a joke. The type of network is practically irrelevant if you're connected to the internet, but this is irrelevant to what I'm talking about. There are other means of security to worry about than network security, including when software unintentionally does damage to your system due to bugs. As well there are many forms of malware that can get on your computer through other means than through these "attacks" you speak of.
Third: most problems with Wayland come down to software that runs on top of Wayland. Adopt is slow but steady and I don't see it dying anytime soon; Wayland will likely take over as the de facto standard that XOrg currently holds. Of course it's not ready yet, and sure it's going to take a while for it to get to the maturity of XOrg, but granted, XOrg has been around for a very long time. Wayland will eventually reach that maturity.
Leave a comment: