Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA's PRIME Helpers Are Ready For Linux 3.9

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ericg
    replied
    Originally posted by johnc View Post
    How does this help them accomplish Optimus?

    I thought it was GPL issues that were the primary stumbling block.
    They are, the PRIME helpers introduces non-GPL interfaces for them to use instead of the standard DMA_BUF ones this way they arent directly touching GPL code and have a non-gpl middle layer between the driver and dma_buf

    Leave a comment:


  • johnc
    replied
    How does this help them accomplish Optimus?

    I thought it was GPL issues that were the primary stumbling block.

    Leave a comment:


  • blackout23
    replied
    Does this have any negative effects compared to simply using DMA_BUFF?

    Next goal. KMS and I will cream myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • WorBlux
    replied
    Originally posted by GT220 View Post
    Nvidia rocks once again and Linus, Cox & GPL nazis can go and four letter word themselves.
    Let's pretend that they weren't and let Nvidia link a proprietary BLOb directly into the kerenel internals without making a fuss. A few years down the road some competing company that had contributed code into the drm or dma_buf sections of the kernel could sue NVIDIA and set them back financially and legally. In such a case almost noone would be willing to get close to the kernel. Companies are much more comfortable around Linux when violations of the license are first met with loud and clear warnings, instead of court action. You may not like the GPL, but Linux for better or worse is pretty much stuck with it. If you don't like it, go implement dma_buf on FreeBSD. (Oh that's right, It's several years away from the point where you could even start)

    Leave a comment:


  • entropy
    replied
    Originally posted by vitiv View Post
    PS. I hope Alan Cox and friends won't throw a tantrum over this just for the sake of suing somebody, considering NVIDIA actually implemented this functionality themselves.
    Why would that be a bad thing?
    Actually, one should hope he does (in some way).
    That would probably clear up the legal situation once for all.

    Leave a comment:


  • vitiv
    replied
    Although I like having open-source infrastructures, when it comes to the end user it doesn't really matter that much whether their GPU driver is os or not. In my opinion the only way we could achieve this is if NVIDIA and other hardware producers would decide to contribute to os drivers themselves(tegra coms to mind); reverse engineering is remarkable but not really sustainable, especially for complex hardware such as GPUs.

    PS. I hope Alan Cox and friends won't throw a tantrum over this just for the sake of suing somebody, considering NVIDIA actually implemented this functionality themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • dh04000
    replied
    Hopefully, nvidia already has most of thier optimus work done on thier end and once these helpers are in place, we'll have a beta release with support next day.

    Also, lets hope that Alan Cox doesn't go and threaten to sue everyone rampage again and "cox block" the helpers as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • mark45
    replied
    Originally posted by GT220 View Post
    Nvidia rocks once again and Linus, Cox & GPL nazis can go and four letter word themselves.
    True.






    ten chars rule bla bla phoronix

    Leave a comment:


  • GT220
    replied
    Nvidia rocks once again and Linus, Cox & GPL nazis can go and four letter word themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pajn
    replied
    Finally. It's easy for Linus to say fuck you to Nvidia when the kernel developers works against them by being shitheads.
    Now Nvidia should be able to create optimus support.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X