Originally posted by RealNC
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Programming Languages For X Applications
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by RealNC View PostWell, he is an academic. Those are among the most misinformed people I know of, to the point of being completely detached from actual reality.
Its also one of the reasons so little development (and optimizations - every GTK release since 1.2 has only gotten slower) happens inside of GTK+ itself, its just plain hard - adding a single public method requires the developer to add code to about ~4 different places, just because they still stick to C and emulate object orientation by abusing macros and structurs.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, he is an academic. Those are among the most misinformed people I know of, to the point of being completely detached from actual reality.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't see how he ever actually made the case for the focus on languages (though I skipped some of the Q&A). Basically, a lot of his explanations come off to me as "someone wrote a problematic toolkit in/for <language> that became popular, therefore we should abandon <language> for desktop application development". It's not as though GTK+ or Qt represent the height of elegantly idiomatic C or C++. Had that been the case, I think his point would have made a lot more sense as stated.
Leave a comment:
-
This is why I like D. Convenience + Power/Efficiency. Still needs work though (better GC, ARM support, etc)
Leave a comment:
-
Great talk!
I still remember the day I wrote my first GUI app using WINAPI in C++, so much effort for something that should normally be simple.
Leave a comment:
-
Programming Languages For X Applications
Phoronix: Programming Languages For X Applications
Bart Massey, an X.Org Foundation Board of Directors member and Portland State University employee, shared his opinions this week on programming languages for X applications and the web vs. the desktop...
Tags: None
Leave a comment: