Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Programming Languages For X Applications

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Detructor
    replied
    Originally posted by RealNC View Post
    Well, he is an academic. Those are among the most misinformed people I know of, to the point of being completely detached from actual reality.
    well, I didn't saw the videos but...everyone who writes a GUI based program in C or C++ should be thrown into a desert, far away from any technology so that he can't do any further damage to humanity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Linuxhippy
    replied
    Originally posted by RealNC View Post
    Well, he is an academic. Those are among the most misinformed people I know of, to the point of being completely detached from actual reality.
    Although I really didn't get the conclusion of the talk (except that the choice of PL does matter of course), I just have to agree with him: GTK+ is a pain in the ass.
    Its also one of the reasons so little development (and optimizations - every GTK release since 1.2 has only gotten slower) happens inside of GTK+ itself, its just plain hard - adding a single public method requires the developer to add code to about ~4 different places, just because they still stick to C and emulate object orientation by abusing macros and structurs.

    Leave a comment:


  • RealNC
    replied
    Well, he is an academic. Those are among the most misinformed people I know of, to the point of being completely detached from actual reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ex-Cyber
    replied
    I don't see how he ever actually made the case for the focus on languages (though I skipped some of the Q&A). Basically, a lot of his explanations come off to me as "someone wrote a problematic toolkit in/for <language> that became popular, therefore we should abandon <language> for desktop application development". It's not as though GTK+ or Qt represent the height of elegantly idiomatic C or C++. Had that been the case, I think his point would have made a lot more sense as stated.

    Leave a comment:


  • F i L
    replied
    This is why I like D. Convenience + Power/Efficiency. Still needs work though (better GC, ARM support, etc)

    Leave a comment:


  • mybug
    replied
    Great talk!
    I still remember the day I wrote my first GUI app using WINAPI in C++, so much effort for something that should normally be simple.

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic Programming Languages For X Applications

    Programming Languages For X Applications

    Phoronix: Programming Languages For X Applications

    Bart Massey, an X.Org Foundation Board of Directors member and Portland State University employee, shared his opinions this week on programming languages for X applications and the web vs. the desktop...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X