RandR version inaccuracy
It appears this announcement is a little inaccurate in that it specifies RandR version 1.5 - the announcement itself does not mention the specific version of randr included. A slightly later announcement - http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2012-July/054852.html - does. Randr version 1.4 will be the version to include the provider object support, and is as far as I can tell the newest version.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X.Org Server 1.13 RC1 Packs In Many Changes
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by uid313 View PostBut can ES 3 do all cool things that OpenGL 4.2 do?
The point was that the API is going to be released in 2012, so if it's implemented in Mesa does that mean that it's up to 2012 standards? The real world is a little more complicated.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by uid313 View PostNo, because when OpenGL ES 3.0 is release, then Linux will probably not have support for it, or will it?
Leave a comment:
-
Proprietary drivers support all the GL levels today, don't they ?
My question was "*when* GL ES 3.0 support is released will you stay the stack is at the level of 2012", ie even if it happen in 2525 ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostThen when GL ES 3.0 support is released "the graphics stack will be at the state of 2012", right ?
And what about OpenGL 4.2?
Linux is a half-decade behind in the graphics world.
Leave a comment:
-
Then when GL ES 3.0 support is released "the graphics stack will be at the state of 2012", right ?
Leave a comment:
-
Yay!
Soon we have OpenGL 3.0 support, then our graphics stack is at the state of 1998!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: