If anyone is seeing regressions, please file bugs:
and attach your xorg log and dmesg output. Also, if you could narrow down the problematic component (kernel, ddx, mesa) and bisect it, that would be really helpful.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Impact Of Radeon DRM On Linux 3.3, DRM-Next
Collapse
X
-
GL_RENDERER = Gallium 0.4 on AMD REDWOOD
GL_VERSION = 2.1 Mesa 8.0.1
GL_VENDOR = X.Org
814 frames in 5.0 seconds = 162.771 FPS
783 frames in 5.0 seconds = 156.577 FPS
772 frames in 5.0 seconds = 154.280 FPS
717 frames in 5.0 seconds = 143.378 FPS
673 frames in 5.0 seconds = 134.488 FPS
----
From glxgears -info on the Fedora 17 KDE Beta TC2 disc.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaemonFC View Post[...]
It helps also to use a kernel without debugging options enabled. With this option enabled my system freezes sometimes. I have no idea if Beta TC2 already used the kernel version above or a older version with debugging enabled.
list of recent fedora kernelsLast edited by Fenrin; 19 March 2012, 08:09 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Whoops, sorry... I was responding to DaemonFC, should have quoted for clarity. Sounded like he was seeing a much greater regression than you did.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostFirst thought is that sounds like more than a performance regression. Maybe check the renderer string ?
Leave a comment:
-
First thought is that sounds like more than a performance regression. Maybe check the renderer string ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by glisse View PostDefinitly not able to reproduce HD6950 regression you are seeing. F16 drm-next + mesa git from today (also tried with git ddx)
Games are unplayable, kwin is barely even usable.
Do you know what the story is with that and when it might be resolved?
I checked it out using the Beta TC2 ISO.
Leave a comment:
-
My HD7970 is currently getting 0 fps with the open source graphics stack, so I'd be happy to see performance numbers like Cayman's World of Padman -- that would be infinity times better than what I have now.
Also, it's very interesting that you think that "The results for Nexuiz are more interesting than Nexuiz". I would tend to agree; Nexuiz is not a very interesting game, but the performance results that you produced, using it, are very interesting indeed. I think you might have typoed this and meant to say something like "The results for Nexuiz are more interesting than Doom 3", but that would be eliding the very deep philosophical point you validly made about the level of intrigue associated with playing the game Nexuiz versus benchmarking it.
Leave a comment:
-
Definitly not able to reproduce HD6950 regression you are seeing. F16 drm-next + mesa git from today (also tried with git ddx)
Leave a comment:
-
Michael, what about the mesa daily benchmarking you were willing do deploy? Is there any news?
It seems we really need such a thing...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: