So Xlib is the only true, large and irreplavable legacy cruft? Good! E17 is maturing as a desktop shell and I recently found out that E17|EFL works on Xcb.
So in order for me to respond I first need a deeper underatanding of the architecture. But are you saying that the complexity is something from the past and that the complaints from the critics are all at least largely adressed? Because I remember going through LFS and found that without the automated buildsystem it is quite hellish. So is the complexity adressed at the code level too?
So in order for me to respond I first need a deeper underatanding of the architecture. But are you saying that the complexity is something from the past and that the complaints from the critics are all at least largely adressed? Because I remember going through LFS and found that without the automated buildsystem it is quite hellish. So is the complexity adressed at the code level too?
Comment