Originally posted by patstew
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Do You Want From Linux GPU Drivers In 2010?
Collapse
X
-
The way it's meant to be supported
Originally posted by yotambien View PostThat they improve to the point where a thread like this would have no sense. This is, parity with Windows.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ua=42 View PostWorking Suspend resume on NVIDIA binary.
Leave a comment:
-
1. >=OpenGL2 for my r500 card (so I can finally drop fglrx)
2. PowerManagement
3. decent OSS r800 support so I can consider a ATi card for my next pc/notebook.
Leave a comment:
-
personally, i need more of R500 love:
on windoze i'm able to play Half-Life 2 in 1280x800@high without AA and filtering with my "Mobility Radeon X2300" but on my Gentoo system it is only recently i was able to run... Jets'n'Guns.
glxinfo says:
OpenGL vendor string: DRI R300 Project
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (RV515 718A) 20090101 TCL DRI2
OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 7.8-devel
Leave a comment:
-
That they improve to the point where a thread like this would have no sense. This is, parity with Windows.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd like to see Kernel Mode Setting for the proprietary Nvidia driver.
Ideally I'd like Nvidia to switch to supporting Nouveau on Linux, but that's not likely.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd love switchable graphics support so I can at runtime shift from my Intel integrated to my ATI discrete graphics chip.
Better 3D performance and accuracy in Intel's drivers, been running into some issues there.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: