"XvMC was last relevant over 10 years ago, if ever. There is no reason to use it today."
What a strange thing to say. It was definitely something relevant back in the day. Nobody remember DVDs? Or DVB? MPEG2 was a pretty important codec, and was more often than not interlaced. CPUs back then really struggled to decode/de-interlace broadcast or DVD quality in real-time.
Xv was also a big deal, it allowed hw colourspace conversion/scaling using an overlay independent of the screen format by using a specific colour (colour-key) to be replaced during scanout with the overlay buffer. It did result in some weird effects sometimes when the specific colour was used incidentally! Most CPUs at the time couldn't achieve full frame rate video while also decoding the codec otherwise.
It's all pretty irrelevant today, unless using vintage hardware.
What a strange thing to say. It was definitely something relevant back in the day. Nobody remember DVDs? Or DVB? MPEG2 was a pretty important codec, and was more often than not interlaced. CPUs back then really struggled to decode/de-interlace broadcast or DVD quality in real-time.
Xv was also a big deal, it allowed hw colourspace conversion/scaling using an overlay independent of the screen format by using a specific colour (colour-key) to be replaced during scanout with the overlay buffer. It did result in some weird effects sometimes when the specific colour was used incidentally! Most CPUs at the time couldn't achieve full frame rate video while also decoding the codec otherwise.
It's all pretty irrelevant today, unless using vintage hardware.
Comment