Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

X11 Library Sees Lots Of Fixes With libX11 1.7 Release

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vistaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Nth_man View Post
    Those jokes are getting rusty...
    No worries, it's a temporary spike. Soon these jokes will rust in piece.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevelyan
    replied
    On another topic, my wife told me last night that my toddler daughter has “deleted the internet” and if I could restore it. Perhaps if we have to recreate it, we should do so with rust?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nth_man
    replied
    Those jokes are getting rusty...

    Leave a comment:


  • treba
    replied
    The XSetIOErrorExitHandler will be used in Gnome to handle Xwayland crashes gracefully. That should help with stability, as apparently quite a few crashes of the Wayland session are in Xorg, not the compositor.

    Leave a comment:


  • kpedersen
    replied
    I have a sneaky suspicion that these forums are not hosted on a Rust written web server. Michael, tell us it isn't so! Or we all need to leave

    Leave a comment:


  • marios
    replied
    Originally posted by Ironmask View Post

    No because Git/GitHub isn't written in Rust.
    Can you give me a link to you git repo (the server of which is written in Rust), with your git implementation (in Rust of course) and the afore-mentioned project?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ironmask
    replied
    Originally posted by Raka555 View Post

    Do you have a github link to your project where you are doing the rewrite ?
    No because Git/GitHub isn't written in Rust.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lycanthropist
    replied
    Is there something similar to XSetIOErrorExitHandler in xcb?

    Leave a comment:


  • Raka555
    replied
    Originally posted by Ironmask View Post

    Sounds good to me! A small price to pay for the Superior Rust Future.
    Do you have a github link to your project where you are doing the rewrite ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ironmask
    replied
    Originally posted by brad0 View Post

    That would just result in two separately maintained implementations.
    Sounds good to me! A small price to pay for the Superior Rust Future.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X