Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

X Server 1.6.0 Has Been Released

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic X Server 1.6.0 Has Been Released

    X Server 1.6.0 Has Been Released

    Phoronix: X Server 1.6.0 Has Been Released

    It's arriving about two months later than originally scheduled (and didn't arrive in 2008 like Intel wanted), but X Server 1.6 has been officially released this afternoon and it wasn't 212 days late like the infamous X Server 1.4.1 release.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13539

  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by elanthis View Post
    So far as fglrx being behind... who cares? I'd rather AMD put what resources they can into the Open Source development rather than trying to keep the stupid blob on the cutting edge. NVIDIA puts all of their Linux devs (like 3 of them, tops, iirc) on the proprietary blob, so it's rather natural that they manage to keep up faster (although they have still lagged a LOT many times before.... I can't count how many times I've had to reinstall older X server packages on distros when I was stuck using NVIDIA's driver).
    I completely agree. I used nvidia cards for few years and nvidia closed blob were an only reason why my Linux box crashed sometimes. I'm very happy AMD/Ati r500 card owner now. Things which has the most priority for me work perfectly - compiz, video playback, desktop is very smooth now, I can play some 3D games too. I get rid of binary and proprietary crap from my system at last.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arch64
    replied
    Oh my, Ctrl+alt+backspace NOT working by default !!

    These Xorg devs have no priorities ! It is outrageous.

    --------

    At least, the perfomance is really good.

    xf86-video-ati-git here-Arch Linux x64 - with DRI2 enabled.
    Last edited by Arch64; 02-27-2009, 07:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SyXbiT
    replied
    I agree that I'd much rather a driver use proper XServer stuff (and DRI2 etc..), but at the end of the day, I just want my graphics card to run compiz and play videos at the same time..
    and NOW

    I don't care about gaming benchmarks. I can dual boot to windows for gaming. I care about quick support for XServers and compiz, videos, and now, hardware h264 decoding.

    Leave a comment:


  • highlandsun
    replied
    I wonder when someone will package this for Ubuntu Intrepid; too many things still don't work on my laptop when I test the Jaunty images...

    Leave a comment:


  • elanthis
    replied
    Originally posted by Kjella View Post
    Of course AMD can do as nVidia did and make the whole X server into some half-proprietary hybrid but it'd be costly, not open source friendly and most of all way outside what a hardware company should normally do to deliver a driver.
    You seem to be under the impression that NVIDIA put forth a lot of effort to replace all those X bits. The reality is that they replaced all those X bits because it resulted in less effort (not more) since they already had all those replacement bits working for the most part. It's really just a port of their Windows GL driver with the minimum amount of glue put in place to get it working.

    So far as fglrx being behind... who cares? I'd rather AMD put what resources they can into the Open Source development rather than trying to keep the stupid blob on the cutting edge. NVIDIA puts all of their Linux devs (like 3 of them, tops, iirc) on the proprietary blob, so it's rather natural that they manage to keep up faster (although they have still lagged a LOT many times before.... I can't count how many times I've had to reinstall older X server packages on distros when I was stuck using NVIDIA's driver).

    Leave a comment:


  • bridgman
    replied
    Probably. I doubt that either ATI or NVidia binary drivers will use DRI2. The ATI open source drivers have had DRI2 running for a while, and airlied was spinning gears on a cube using his merged R1xx-R5xx Mesa driver a few days ago, but the memory management code isn't ready to go into the kernel yet. Same goes for Nouveau -- they've also been running on DRI2 for a while but it was built over TTM just like the radeon code.

    Leave a comment:


  • curaga
    replied
    So, how's the driver support on DRI2? Only Intel with a release?

    Leave a comment:


  • bulletxt
    replied
    Originally posted by Kjella View Post
    If you wanted a system where the kernel is open source, the middle is a big blob and you can run open source applications on top, we already have it. It's called a Mac, and they're much better at it than nVidia is.

    Of course AMD can do as nVidia did and make the whole X server into some half-proprietary hybrid but it'd be costly, not open source friendly and most of all way outside what a hardware company should normally do to deliver a driver. If they just wanted to throw a pile of money at it to take the Linux market they could, but then they'd probably also have to go closed source to get an ROI on that investment.

    I use nVidias blob but I don't like depending on a blob, and I sure don't want the blobs to grow taking over for more open source functionality. I'd much rather they helped make xserver better so that I don't have to run the blob. Yes, please improve the parts nVidia is overriding but please also keep it open source. I think there's a lot you could help the open source community with without giving away any of the secret sauce...

    mmm...ok yea. However my ATI 2600XT won't work 100% as it should before who knows when. I think 2010 and even in that year I'm sure it will still have limitations... So you talk about open here and open there. I talk about a customer that works and goes to the mall or wherever, gets 150$ from his pocket and buys an AMD card. Goes home, puts it in and realized he's done a mistake, crappy FGLRX, open source driver that is totally incomplete. Now go tell him about open things.

    I am still sure NVIDIA will continue to be number 1 for the Linux operating system for next years. Every 1 step AMD does, NVIDIA does 10. And the open source driver will never be feature-rich or optimized as the NVIDIA blob.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kjella
    replied
    Originally posted by bulletxt View Post
    Basicly you just said NVIDIA is ahead. Also there is no good reason why AMD hasn't done what NVIDIA did. Conclusion: NVIDIA is ahead.
    If you wanted a system where the kernel is open source, the middle is a big blob and you can run open source applications on top, we already have it. It's called a Mac, and they're much better at it than nVidia is.

    Of course AMD can do as nVidia did and make the whole X server into some half-proprietary hybrid but it'd be costly, not open source friendly and most of all way outside what a hardware company should normally do to deliver a driver. If they just wanted to throw a pile of money at it to take the Linux market they could, but then they'd probably also have to go closed source to get an ROI on that investment.

    I use nVidias blob but I don't like depending on a blob, and I sure don't want the blobs to grow taking over for more open source functionality. I'd much rather they helped make xserver better so that I don't have to run the blob. Yes, please improve the parts nVidia is overriding but please also keep it open source. I think there's a lot you could help the open source community with without giving away any of the secret sauce...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X