Does anyone know which x265 profiles are supported in the hardware decoder? Is it just HEVC Main, or does it also handle 10bit decoding like with HEVC Main 10?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Allwinner "Cedrus" Video Decoder Supports H.265 On Linux 5.5
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by caligula View PostNo it's not. Firefox has supported HW accelerated videos via Flash for eternity.
Also if your system is ARM you can't install flash player because it is available only for x86 (32bit and 64bit PC) systems so you can't use it on raspi or these boards.
Firefox HW acceleration means that firefox can play videos served with HTML5 standard with HW acceleration.
I know that many parts of the rendering pipeline are accelerated and even video decoding can be offloaded.
Chrome, OTOH, has long supported hw accelerated video.
many people have been successful with technology such as Pipelight DRM.
Can't view any videos without proprietary flash plugin.
Consider that by the end of 2020 Flash will be officially discontinued by Adobe, so all half-serious sites should have a HTML5 video service set up by now, november 2019Last edited by starshipeleven; 30 November 2019, 01:49 AM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Terrablit View PostDoes anyone know which x265 profiles are supported in the hardware decoder? Is it just HEVC Main, or does it also handle 10bit decoding like with HEVC Main 10?
...leads me to believe only 8 bit.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostOn my system it's not usable (I get modern art psychedelic slideshows when I try to play around 30% of Youtube videos I try to watch, and 100% of youtube livestreams are unwatchable, when I switch off HW acceleration the video and streams plays correctly).
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostRaspi sucks
Tried to build a smart doorbell with a BananaPI M2M first, then an OrangePI Zero Plus2 H5. Terrible software-side support. Old kernels, a lot of binary blobs, a lot of bugs. They have an ffmpeg-3.3.x binary, in a dir under /usr/local/bin and they didn't even bother to install its dependencies. Yes, you try to run it and the executable spits out xxx.so not found. Why a special binary? Because it supports their CedarX proprietary h264 hardware encoder. Otherwise no luck with that. For some reason, BananaPI images don't have the audio codec driver built-in. You cannot use the audio system on the M2M ( there is a great DAC with a 100dB amplifier and an on-board mic, but you must use a community distro with all the software bits in their place...but you lose on the camera side, because there is no CedarX in the community distro ).
There are some amateurish Linux spins. Always lack something. Absurd hardware lock-in ( you cannot use RPi cameras on these things...why? I can even use the RPi camera module on a Nvidia Jetson Nano!! ).
Opensource support. Yes there is and there isn't. The guys at Bootlin are doing an amazing job, but they are forced to fight against a behemoth of closed source blobs ( Allwinner ).
Armbian and friends sadly don't support MIPI CSI on these boards. Ouch, you cannot even use a CSI camera. What about the camera ecosystem? Forget about M12 lens mounts, wide angle fisheye lenses, IR-cut cameras, auto focus. You just have the bare camera module they sell ( OV5640 for BananaPI and GC2350 for OrangePI ).
Sadly I have been forced to return to the old and tried RPi Zero. Its SoC is slow compared to the quad core ones on the other two boards, but at least you have a working platform to start with.
So I will start considering the chinese boards only when they will start playing the opensource game seriously.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pabloski View PostUntil you try the alternatives.
I'm not touching anything like that, I only use x86 systems because I can't be arsed to deal with embedded device bs.
It's more expensive but I'm not deploying them en-masse so I don't care.Last edited by starshipeleven; 30 November 2019, 01:42 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostYou get what you pay for. Raspi still sucks.
I'm not touching anything like that, I only use x86 systems because I can't be arsed to deal with embedded device bs.
It's more expensive but I'm not deploying them en-masse so I don't care.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DanL View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostIt's comparable to a decent wifi access point unless you are running stuff like prime95.
Comment
Comment