The Linux Direct Rendering Manger Subsystem Poised To Have A Second Maintainer

[phoronix]

Phoronix: The Linux Direct Rendering Manger Subsystem Poised To Have A Second Maintainer

For hopefully helping out with code reviews and getting code staged in a timely manner before being upstreamed to the mainline Linux kernel, Daniel Vetter of the Intel Open-Source Technology Center is set to become a co-maintainer...

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-DRM-Co-Maintainer

[uid313]

When can Linux support HDMI 2.1 VRR and VESA Adaptive-Sync?

[AsuMagic]

Number of CoC abuses: 0
Days since contributor blames CoC: flips back to zero

[MuPuF]

Number of CoC abuses: 0
Days since contributor blames CoC: flips back to zero

You just don't know what you are talking about. We do not advertise the offenders, but they exist.

Martin, sitting on the X.Org Board of Directors

[boxie]

When can Linux support HDMI 2.1 VRR and VESA Adaptive-Sync?

4.21 at this stage has this AFAIK

[Redfoxmoon]

Anyone who is for adding regressive political documents to foss projects are either useful idiots or have malicious intent. IMHO

[tomtomme]

Can you elaborate on what Martin did?

He is Martin as far as understood.

[Redfoxmoon]

He is Martin as far as understood.

Oh dear me, yes now that I look back on it, yes, yes. I feel dumb now

[varikonniemi]

In a situation like this the person should be banned from making the decision to pull intel code. He could review etc. but the other maintainer should make the decision to pull or not.

[Brisse]

varikonniemi Personally I don't see a problem as long as one corporation doesn't have a monopoly on maintainers and the development process is as transparent as Linux is. Also, there is still Linus at the top of the hierarchy.