If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RADV vs. AMDGPU-PRO vs. AMDVLK Vulkan Linux Driver Performance
Yes, the LLVM parts are the same. The frontends, i.e. the parts that translate SPIR-V into LLVM IR, are different though.
Thanks for the reply. Makes sens as the performance of RADV and AMDVLK had similar patterns.
Hopefully LLVM will close the gap with PRO.
AMD Team from AMDVLK is the one working on improving LLVM, right?
Is the work different for the mesa team and amdvmlk team on LLVM?
If so, in simple terms, why please?
Compute team focuses on what we need for compute frameworks, mesa team focuses on what we need for OpenGL, and Vulkan team on what we need for Vulkan. Obviously a lot of it is common.
Compute team focuses on what we need for compute frameworks, mesa team focuses on what we need for OpenGL, and Vulkan team on what we need for Vulkan. Obviously a lot of it is common.
I guessed compute would be different, but without any knowledge of GPU or 3D I'd assume that graphics API shouldn't matter much at that stage. Obviously I'm wrong. Is it more optimizations that separates you guys? or do you actually have different features for some reasons? I'm just curious
Comment