Originally posted by Hi-Angel
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canonical Is Hiring Graphics Stack Developers To Work On Mir
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 3
-
It would've been a great decision if they hired devs for Unity, not Mir. Unlike Mir, Unity is actually a great peace of software that I'd prefer to both kde and gnome.
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shanefagan View PostLooking at the comments above made me pretty disappointed in the community at large so I'm going to say it below in bold so they can understand:
When wondering why nobody understands or get you, maybe the problem is not so much with all the other people. Entirety of Mir is highly confusing.
Leave a comment:
-
Does IoT need graphics driver crashes etc. ? or is it that IoT just means "computer" now.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by uid313 View PostWhy would they want Mir? What does it bring to the table?
Leave a comment:
-
Why would they want Mir? What does it bring to the table?
Wayland is a specification for a protocol, it isn't an implementation!!!!! Mir itself as of right now is an implementation of the specification for the Wayland protocol.
There is space for a lightweight display server or maybe Canonical uses Mir for their Gnome spin in the future, if they really want to. It is an option, not some random thing, there are a few Wayland implementations. Weston is one of them, Mir is now one of them and maybe some other company down the line can also implement the protocol. There are 8 implementations of Wayland I found in the 5 minutes of random googling I did.
- Likes 21
Leave a comment:
-
Somehow I think Canonical missed the original memo that Wayland isn't a compositor/display-server. Now that Mir is a Wayland compositor (as it should have been all along) suddenly it's actually useful to people, including Canonical!
- Likes 9
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: