Originally posted by hrkristian
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GNOME Shell 4 Proposal Published To Be More Wayland-Focused
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by leipero View Post
What I do not understand is why people even use Caffeine extension?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Maybe they can make it less SystemD-focused while they're changing things.
I'm serious, not trolling, for the record. Not a battle of SystemD being good or bad. Just a general "DE shouldn't require a specific init system" argument.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Holograph View PostMaybe they can make it less SystemD-focused while they're changing things.
I'm serious, not trolling, for the record. Not a battle of SystemD being good or bad. Just a general "DE shouldn't require a specific init system" argument.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
A more Wayland focused DE is very much a welcomed thing!
Maybe they could also introduce a "X11 apps can only run in a flatpack/snap" rule at the same time so there is no X11 files lying around on the root file system.
Even better if the is a little red warning on the title bar that says "Caution, this app is using legacy X11 and is therefore insecure".
Nothing quite like a little red warning visible to users to encourage developers
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by eddie View PostI'll add that, if they still decide to continue with the approach of building out Shell and its extensions via a JavaScript engine, I'd hope that they at least switch to Kotlin/JS or TypeScript to define the APIs. As it stands I actually have never been able to find proper API documentation at all. Of course, an even better solution would be to pick a language-agnostic IDL, but that might be hoping for too much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxie View PostA more Wayland focused DE is very much a welcomed thing!
Maybe they could also introduce a "X11 apps can only run in a flatpack/snap" rule at the same time so there is no X11 files lying around on the root file system.
Comment
Comment