Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Android Runtime On Chrome OS Makes Use Of Wayland
Collapse
X
-
Since it's making use of Wayland, if Google open-sources this new ARC solution I can't see why a distro wouldn't include it. Hopefully this would incentivize the effort to make Android apps look nice on larger formfactors as well
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostLet's read together what I wrote.
"opensource orgs that work for ideals aren't exactly happy to toil to add a major closed-source app provider to linux."
closed-source app
app
Perhaps you meant something Android specific, then the point of the discussion is that its ecosystem is divergent of GNU/Linux one, and I was wondering why to not bring it here.
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostSure there is F-Droid that is a FOSS store of apps, but 99.9999% of those that want to run an Android app they want to run a binary blob from the Google Store.
Probably, I should emphasize, why would anyone interested in these apps. I'm not interested, neither, probably you. But you're probably noticed, there are peoples interested in running Android on their netbooks, for whatever reason. This means that there're peoples, interested in those apps, so if GNU/Linux could run them, the peoples could've use that instead of Android on their netbooks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostThat's because Android is Google's stuff. There is no real monetary benefit in making a layer to run apps for Google, for free.
And the opensource orgs that work for ideals aren't exactly happy to toil to add a major closed-source app provider to linux.
Google's runtime for chromeOS is mostly open afaik, which allows people to just port it over and run it inside Chromium (Google doesn't really have any good reason to prevent that) https://archon-runtime.github.io/
The incentive for Google to port their android runtime(and services) to other operating systems is the same as Google deciding to provide Android, and the rest of their services, for free.
It is bizarre, however, that no one has yet finished the work of porting the runtime to a nearly identical Linux base.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostI guessed Compatibility Layer, I don't think CL has a standardized meaning in this context.
I'm somewhat Ok with that as Google is firmly a service-based company and has no intention to go other ways (i.e. start extortion businness with licenses). Service-based businness model is best for keeping stuff open, and more respectful of customer needs too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JonathanM View PostSorry if I'm not adding much to the discussion, but what does CL mean? I hate not knowing what words mean...
I'm getting increasingly uncomfortable with googles power over the android ecosystem. Well, actually, it's getting too big and powerful in general.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hi-Angel View PostWell, but aren't Android open source anyway? I'm actually wondering too why wouldn't some of GNU/Linux companies take over a project to run Android apps on GNU/Linux systems —
"opensource orgs that work for ideals aren't exactly happy to toil to add a major closed-source app provider to linux."
closed-source app
app
Sure there is F-Droid that is a FOSS store of apps, but 99.9999% of those that want to run an Android app they want to run a binary blob from the Google Store.
that would bring a big ecosystem with almost no efforts (as opposed to Windows/WINE efforts, and Windows not even free).
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry if I'm not adding much to the discussion, but what does CL mean? I hate not knowing what words mean...
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostGoogle's revenue comes from the store (ads and apps), why you think they opensourced this? Same as with Android. It's a trap to get others to expand their market, for free.
Originally posted by Hi-Angel View Postell, but aren't Android open source anyway? I'm actually wondering too why wouldn't some of GNU/Linux companies take over a project to run Android apps on GNU/Linux systems — that would bring a big ecosystem with almost no efforts (as opposed to Windows/WINE efforts, and Windows not even free).
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tomin View Post
Sailfish OS isn't probably major enough. And even there it's available only to phones sold with license and therefore none of the ports to other phones have it. And it must be installed from software store separately so not quite out of the box even with Jolla phone.
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostAnd the opensource orgs that work for ideals aren't exactly happy to toil to add a major closed-source app provider to linux.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by andre30correia View Postmost likely google shutdown all this projects,
Google's revenue comes from the store (ads and apps), why you think they opensourced this? Same as with Android. It's a trap to get others to expand their market, for free.
maybe a CL for ubuntu touch was the solution for the lack of app's, at least some of them
With a good enough CL there is no more need to make native apps for Ubuntu Touch.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: