Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Google Chrome 50 Released With Wayland Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Google Chrome 50 Released With Wayland Support

    Phoronix: Google Chrome 50 Released With Wayland Support

    The exciting day has continued of open-source/Linux news with Google now releasing Chrome 50...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Wow, this is excellent. OTC kicks serious ass.

    Comment


    • #3
      Also it has unicode regex support

      Comment


      • #4
        Running Arch. The package for this (which downloads Debian debs) appears to be linked against the wayland libraries.

        $ ldd /opt/google/chrome/chrome | grep -i wayland
        libwayland-client.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwayland-client.so.0 (0x00007f097a0c3000)
        libwayland-server.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwayland-server.so.0 (0x00007f0979eb1000)

        It looks like when I launch it in a gnome shell (3.20) wayland session it's still running under xwayland. Anybody know how/if this can be forced to use Wayland?

        Comment


        • #5
          Is this in Chromium now also?

          Comment


          • #6
            Vulkan for Chrome is being worked on aswell, but no ETA:

            https://chromium.googlesource.com/sk...35e5583be96b2f

            Comment


            • #7
              From my point of view Wayland is disaster, i expected that there would be Xserver features parity, i Wayland need some coding and support on app side its wrong.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ruthan View Post
                From my point of view Wayland is disaster, i expected that there would be Xserver features parity, i Wayland need some coding and support on app side its wrong.
                FYI, if you want X in your app you need some coding and support too

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by magika View Post
                  FYI, if you want X in your app you need some coding and support too
                  Yes, but if would be Wayland compatible i wouldnt need 2 branches, one for Wayland and one for X.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ruthan View Post
                    From my point of view Wayland is disaster, i expected that there would be Xserver features parity, i Wayland need some coding and support on app side its wrong.
                    Big surprise: Replacing something that isn't broken, is often a lot of work for very little gain

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X