Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

XDG-Shell Protocol Added For Wayland

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • XDG-Shell Protocol Added For Wayland

    Phoronix: XDG-Shell Protocol Added For Wayland

    Kristian H?gsberg committed on Tuesday the initial XDG-Shell protocol support...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    s/Wayland/Weston/

    xdg_shell was added to Weston, not Wayland.

    Comment


    • #3
      They apparently realized that the Wayland protocol being developed mostly by Intel with non-PC solutions in mind (Tizen, cars etc) stayed underdeveloped as a desktop solution, this became clear when Gnome and KDE started implementing Wayland for serious.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by mark45 View Post
        They apparently realized that the Wayland protocol being developed mostly by Intel with non-PC solutions in mind (Tizen, cars etc) stayed underdeveloped as a desktop solution, this became clear when Gnome and KDE started implementing Wayland for serious.
        And here comes the trolling.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by TheBlackCat View Post
          And here comes the trolling.
          XDG shell is there for a good reason, like it or not, playing the "troll" card doesn't change the issue.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by mark45 View Post
            They apparently realized that the Wayland protocol being developed mostly by Intel with non-PC solutions in mind (Tizen, cars etc) stayed underdeveloped as a desktop solution, this became clear when Gnome and KDE started implementing Wayland for serious.
            It was always known. The wl_shell protocol was never developed into a full desktop shell protocol because the DE developers were needed to do a useful work.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by giucam View Post
              It was always known. The wl_shell protocol was never developed into a full desktop shell protocol because the DE developers were needed to do a useful work.
              That's not the only reason. Desktop paradigms change, and including the infrastructure for a particular one to the core protocol leads to the kind of bloat X11 has. Separation of concerns helps you not having to ditch all of your previous work when a given paradigm becomes obsolete. If in a few years the concept of maximizing loses sense, having this in a core protocol becomes bloat.

              Comment

              Working...
              X