Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu Is Going To Deploy Wayland With Unity
Collapse
X
-
'flawless' - yeah, if you don't have to type non-american signs in java applications. As flawless as taking kde's internationalization and then making it WORSE. If you define 'failure' as flawless, then, yes, ubuntu is flawless. But for everybody who needs more than gnome-with-patched-menus ubuntu soon hits a wall.
Leave a comment:
-
stfu dude, try run JACK on fedora + musician programs ubuntu/debian works flawless
stop trolling
Leave a comment:
-
there are three problems with ubuntu:
it is a parasite. The biggest problem.
ubuntards who think they are l33t because they can type 'tar -cjvf' without breaking a fingernail
sites like phoronix acting like ubuntu bitch boys.
I recommend:
ubuntu creates retards .. well done.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by etnlWings View PostSee, this is exactly what we've been saying: objections aren't the product of merit, therefore it's not tall poppy syndrome. Those doing the chopping are only weeding the garden.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by etnlWings View PostOkay, fine. For the sake of argument, let us say that doesn't conform with tribalistic masturbation. What does that have to do with tall poppy syndrome?
Originally posted by etnlWings View PostAgain, we're back at square one: merit. If troller be trollin' for his own self-amusement and/or to satisfy his histrionic inclinations, it really doesn't have anything to do with Ubuntu per se, it's meritorious aspects, or otherwise. You can try to insert merit all you like but it's still likely incidental and apocryphal.
It's not necessarily motivated by choice as per what I'd consider classical trolling along the lines of "troller be trollin' for his own self-amusement"
Do you consider the "to satisfy his histrionic inclinations" aspect not a possible motivation in concert with tall poppy syndrome to get the troller across the line and onto the keyboard to express his bile?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mugginz View PostIf the table was turned and either Fedora, Debian, gentoo or Suse was getting the bulk of the bright lights and attention in the blogosphere and in magazines I think it'd be likely you would indeed see a shift of that hate from where it is and it'd move onto greener pastures.
...
I'm suggesting that there are those that hate it because it is recieving the bulk of publicity and not because of any reasonable reasons.
If Ubuntu had no valid merit then I'd likely not be surprised at statements to that effect.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by etnlWings View PostWell then if you were seriously suggesting that people hate it because it's good, or of merit, then I really don't know what to say. Surely you must acknowledge that your own motivations aren't necessarily shared by everyone else? 'I like x 'cause it's good, therefore the haters must hate it 'cause it's good, too'.
If Ubuntu had no valid merit then I'd likely not be surprised at statements to that effect.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View PostBut if you believe that the anti-Ubuntu hate is due to the tall poppy syndrome, which is caused by Ubuntu's real and measurable merit, then why are there virtually no Fedora-haters or Debian-haters? I admit that there are some gentoo-haters and SUSE-haters, but they are also very few in comparison.
Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View PostI think that the disproportionate amount of hate Ubuntu gets is caused by the fact that many people see a disconnect between the actual merit and the praise they receive.
Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View PostA part of it is also fueled by elitism, and a part is typical Linux distro-warfare typical.
Leave a comment:
-
My belief that Canonical's efforts have merit has a relationship with my view that a lot of the anti Canonical sentiments are the result of tall poppy syndrome so yes, my statement "But I think what Canonical have done does deserves merit" is tied to my "I see that tall poppy syndrome is still strong around these parts" and so I would disagree with your assertion "that was clearly not what you were implicating with the 'around these parts' comment."
Of course none of the quotations I referenced above need fit your two listed categories
False dichotomy anyone?
But what about simple old "look at me, look at me" syndrome? Others wanting to move the spotlight of attention away from "that other brand" and onto their own chosen brand. Tear down those others in order to build up someone else in the view of the masses.
Again, we're back at square one: merit. If troller be trollin' for his own self-amusement and/or to satisfy his histrionic inclinations, it really doesn't have anything to do with Ubuntu per se, it's meritorious aspects, or otherwise. You can try to insert merit all you like but it's still likely incidental and apocryphal.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: