Originally posted by JackLilhammers
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Taiwins Wayland Compositor Switches From WLROOTS To Its Own Library
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Alexmitter View PostSometimes I really wonder what the hell is going on here.
Every single desktop had its own compositor for more then 20 years. Every single one. Why the hell is that an issue now.
How about others that want to try to create they own wayland impl? Go ahead.. But if you're on level like KDE, GNOME, please stick to the official one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Khrundel View PostOne of intended goals of Wayland creation is that everyone can create a new compositor relatively easy. No wonder new compositor arrives some day.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by birdie View Post
Linux has no games, so please just fuck off. Proton/Wine/dosbox? Don't Linux zealots hate everything related to Windows? So, again, please fuck off with your Linux ecosystem bubble.
Linux on the desktop exists only for idiot fan-atics who happily waste months of their lives tackling issues/bugs/regressions and compatibility, whilst poor Windows users just install the software they need and run it seamlessly.
That said I too pity those poor Windows or Apple lusers who just download stuff and use it. Bunch of noobs.
Real pros run their software with sweat and tears
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
I like the GPL (for applications) but GPL on a library sucks!
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
BSD graphical stack comes from Linux so there is a joint down stream effect here. Linux kernel developers not testing the Linux graphic stack with Nvidia stuff the result is the BSD stuff will also come less dependable because they are the downstream.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by birdie View Post
Linux has no games, so please just fuck off. Proton/Wine/dosbox? Don't Linux zealots hate everything related to Windows? So, again, please fuck off with your Linux ecosystem bubble.
Linux on the desktop exists only for idiot fan-atics who happily waste months of their lives tackling issues/bugs/regressions and compatibility, whilst poor Windows users just install the software they need and run it seamlessly.
We install linux for whatever reason we want!
And if a piece of hardware is not supported on linux, or its performance sucks on linux, you should expect it to be rightfully hated by linux users.
Also whoever says that the linux driver of such piece of hardware is good, rightfully enrages linux users.
Finally, whoever says such arguments on a linux forum and ends up acting like a windows fanboy deserves the first sentence of this post...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostThat you assume I use the binary drivers on Linux shows just how much of an uninformed asre you are. I use Nouveau on Linux. [B]The fucking kernel's own Nouveau drivers that asshole Linus himself approved.
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostFact check: I have been using Windows 10 since the day it was officially released. Nothing of that nonsense you talked about ever happened to me on Windows Update. Unlike most gamer fagots, I get all of my drivers exclusively from Windows Update. Zero freezes. Zero broken updates. Zero fuss. Since. Day. 1.
Read this link. Conexant ISST audio drivers mentioned here were in fact provided by Windows update. So getting you drivers exclusively by windows update does not mean a security update of kernel has not be stalled behind your back. Yes Zero fuss on one had on the other you have ignorance is bliss by not knowing what you true system security state is because Microsoft is making the choices on what they think what you want on security.
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostBullshit. My experiences with Windows 10 says it all. The latest build of Win10 is capable of pulling down a fucking binary WiFi driver from 2003 to use perfectly and with better performance than the Linux kernel drivers. That fucking binary driver would never ever have survive a single minor upgrade in Linux from 2.6.27 to 2.6.28, let alone anything in the 5.x series.
Windows does a lot of things so old drivers work lots are not security healthy.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by marios View Post
Arbitrary numbers...
Show me a Linux RTRT benchmark that proves your point. Of course only neutral benchmarks are accepted, not blobs build by nvidia or amd.
Also tell me linux game that uses DLSS.
Finally have you ever ran an nvidia on linux vs nvidia on windows comparison? I have and found out that nvidia on linux is crap. You are getting worse performance on a better OS.
PS: I don't give an f about performance (or features) on windows. Windows is only useful for me as a baseline (linux performance should be better, if it is worse something is amiss).
Linux on the desktop exists only for idiot fan-atics who happily waste months of their lives tackling issues/bugs/regressions and compatibility, whilst poor Windows users just install the software they need and run it seamlessly.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: