Originally posted by Grinness
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wayland 1.19 Is Set To Come Soon As First Update In Nearly One Year
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by clouddrop View Post
sway/wlroots can set custom resolutions in it's config file (since this pr):
Code:*output* <name> mode|resolution|res [--custom] <WIDTHxHEIGHT>[@<RATE>Hz] Configures the specified output to use the given mode. Modes are a combination of width and height (in pixels) and a refresh rate that your display can be configured to use. For a list of available modes for each output, use *swaymsg -t get_outputs*. To set a custom mode not listed in the list of available modes, use *--custom*. You should probably only use this if you know what you're doing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Volta View Post
Since open source nvidia driver developers have no documentation It's a shame on nvidia.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grinness View Post
Changing resolution is accomplished by using the settings panel of the DE/DM (supporting wayland)
In Gnome 3 go to Settings -> Displays.
There you can change:
Orientation
Resolution
Refresh rate
Scale
...
all according to the capabilities of your monitor.
Similar in KDE.
If your DE/DM does not support wayland, use XRANDR (Xorg/X11 specific extension) as you will be using X11 anyway
Comment
-
Originally posted by AJSB View Post
Thanks, can it be possible to that file be used to have several Custom Resolutions / Refresh Rates or is it limited to a single custom mode ?
Code:output HDMI1 mode|resolution|res [--custom] <WIDTHxHEIGHT>[@<RATE>Hz] output eDPI1 mode|resolution|res [--custom] <WIDTHxHEIGHT>[@<RATE>Hz]
Code:swaymsg -t get_outputs
There are a lot of other options that to further configure monitors found in the sway-output(5) manpage and on the official wiki https://github.com/swaywm/sway/wiki.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by AnAccount View Post
Hmmm... during my 20+ years in Linux I have not ever had the need for a custom resolution, it seems that the monitors tend to have the resolutions that I need. And for some reason, I do not think this is a very huge use case. But if that use case is crucial for you, then X is still there. So I do not see why you are whining here.
I agree with cb88 about a reference implementation of every feature. It will cost a fraction of the time that is spent to write and debug everything over and over, such a waste of time.
Edit: fixed some of the typosLast edited by Jabberwocky; 17 December 2020, 01:14 PM.
Comment
-
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by curfew View PostThis is exactly what makes Wayland crippled beyond salvation at this point. There is no standard way for configuring anything -- hell, there might not even be any way for configuring things on a specific desktop environment. If we're lucky there's some command line interface akin to gsettings for configuring a couple of things while for others there are none.
Mir is the only way to bring some sense to this mess, and all DEs should be ported to running on top of Mir -- ASAP!
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment