Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME X.Org vs. Wayland Performance + Power Usage On Fedora 32 With AMD Renoir Laptop

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    The Milky Way is coming to an end too. Just might take a while (see OP).
    Milky Way won't serve as a secondary, run on demand solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post

    That's funny, because it was one of my arguments in another thread. This shows X11 is just becoming Wayland compatibility addon.
    The Milky Way is coming to an end too. Just might take a while (see OP).

    Leave a comment:


  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post

    The talk was about something else spammer.
    It was about that exact issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    Well that's actually true, I didn't notice some of that was XWayland, but I'm at least glad how before what I "provided", you had no clue either.

    E: And of course, shows how much more relevant X11 still is.
    That's funny, because it was one of my arguments in another thread. This shows X11 is just becoming Wayland compatibility addon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    You were responding to someone mocking how recent Wayland supposedly is, so that's why your post made no sense.
    The talk was about something else spammer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post
    So Wayland sucks or tests suck?
    You suck. Stupid spammer.

    Leave a comment:


  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post

    No genius. The 'X' development you provided is more about XWayland and other Wayland related stuff. The 'Wayland' itself is also Mutter, Kwin etc. You're too late and your bullshit is not interesting.
    Well that's actually true, I didn't notice some of that was XWayland, but I'm at least glad how before what I "provided", you had no clue either.

    E: And of course, shows how much more relevant X11 still is.
    Last edited by ArchLinux; 15 June 2020, 12:05 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post

    So it's even worse, but your stupid spam makes no sense.
    You were responding to someone mocking how recent Wayland supposedly is, so that's why your post made no sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post
    No genius. The 'X' development you provided is more about XWayland and other Wayland related stuff. The 'Wayland' itself is also Mutter, Kwin etc. You're too late and your bullshit is not interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    It was released in 2008. Before Obama was elected. The first time. In fact the same month even as Google Chrome and Android.
    So it's even worse, but your stupid spam makes no sense.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X