Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME X.Org vs. Wayland Performance + Power Usage On Fedora 32 With AMD Renoir Laptop

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    royce
    Senior Member

  • royce
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    Well, I actually think native Wayland works more fluently.
    Wayland is not a thing that works more fluently than some other thing. It's a protocol.

    Leave a comment:

  • Volta
    Senior Member

  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    You're talking about your post #39. I quoted your post #12.
    The point was Wayland is quite young. It also matters when Gnome, KDE, Firefox started implementing it. X is 30 years with us and it's still far from perfect.

    Leave a comment:

  • Volta
    Senior Member

  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    Well, I actually think native Wayland works more fluently (about to test), but you got angry so quickly, so I wanted to see how far you'd go.
    You quoted some precious comments (not mine) without a meaningful reason and this is why I was angry. It's smooth. At least with AMD.
    Volta
    Senior Member
    Last edited by Volta; 15 June 2020, 12:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:

  • ArchLinux
    Senior Member

  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post
    A typical tactics from Phoronix. He didn't dispel doubts regarding benchmark. As a few people noted it was probably XWayland benchmark. There are dozens of comments, google bots will notice and the revenue will be higher.
    Well, I actually think native Wayland works more fluently (about to test), but you got angry so quickly, so I wanted to see how far you'd go.

    Leave a comment:

  • ArchLinux
    Senior Member

  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post

    No, he said I didn't figure out for 30 years how to run Quake. I said he didn't figure out how to run Wayland since 2012 or so. You said it's even older, so it's about something else..
    You're talking about your post #39. I quoted your post #12.

    Leave a comment:

  • Volta
    Senior Member

  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    How would you know lol?
    We'll see.

    Leave a comment:

  • Volta
    Senior Member

  • Volta
    replied
    A typical tactics from Phoronix. He didn't dispel doubts regarding benchmark. As a few people noted it was probably XWayland benchmark. There are dozens of comments, google bots will notice and the revenue will be higher.

    Leave a comment:

  • ArchLinux
    Senior Member

  • ArchLinux
    replied
    Originally posted by Volta View Post

    Milky Way won't serve as a secondary, run on demand solution.
    How would you know lol?

    Leave a comment:

  • Volta
    Senior Member

  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    It was about that exact issue.
    No, he said I didn't figure out for 30 years how to run Quake. I said he didn't figure out how to run Wayland since 2012 or so. You said it's even older, so it's about something else..

    Leave a comment:

  • Volta
    Senior Member

  • Volta
    replied
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post

    The Milky Way is coming to an end too. Just might take a while (see OP).
    Milky Way won't serve as a secondary, run on demand solution.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X