Originally posted by kpedersen
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Microsoft Is Writing Its Own Wayland Compositor As Part Of WSL2 GUI Efforts
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by vladpetric View Post
I've been using and developing with Linux for roughly 25 years now. While up to Vista, Windows desktop had been far less stable than Linux, after Windows 7 things changed a lot.
And yes, fragmentation is still insane, most Linux desktop apps look different and have inconsistent shortcuts, and no one really seems to give a FF.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by vladpetric View Post
Windows has a pretty low bar, indeed.
The sad part is that Linux desktop manages to not even get above that bar. Even copy paste doesn't work consistently across apps in Linux.
And the default and most popular environment for Linux desktop is still X11. Bastardized technology, but there's nothing better yet.
EDIT: Calling the evolution of a software project "bastardized" is kinda stupid. Yes, x11 evolved over time, it had to. Obviously. It's the reason why it's still the best display system available today, still....Last edited by duby229; 20 May 2020, 04:00 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Now you have the proof that microsoft loves Linux .
Possible Future:
Windows = The better implemented Linux
Maybe even Windows for Android....
Then Linux will have like nearly 100% market share
Maybe Linus will become a full time microsoft employee
Ok, not very likely that scenario, but it would be a lot of fun .
Comment
-
Originally posted by frank007
Really, without xwayland?Last edited by Volta; 20 May 2020, 04:43 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
Yeah exactly, there is nothing better than x11. That's kinda the whole point.
EDIT: Calling the evolution of a software project "bastardized" is kinda stupid. Yes, x11 evolved over time, it had to. Obviously. It's the reason why it's still the best display system available today, still....
X11's design is so shitty that the people maintaining it have given up on reforming it, and instead work on Wayland. That's why I call it bastardized. It's insecure by design (an app can screw another app on the same system easily; granted there's a secure extension in Xorg, but proper security is rarely achieved by adding an extension).
You really should watch this video from 2013:
Please note, that I don't own this video. At the time servers hosting original file were overloaded so I re-uploaded for user's convenience.Original file was...
You can skip to 7:20, though he explains in that time why he's qualified
Quotes:
(about x11) "A mechanism for any client to enforce its idiot wishes on everyone"
"Programming X is like reading one of those French philosophers where afterwards you start wondering whether you know anything for sure" Thomas Thurman
"Why would you fix anything if you can work around it?"
There's more, but I won't spoil it.
This video also gives a clear idea as to how disorganized and corrupt free software projects can be.
Hopefully Wayland is fully functional before we get fusion power.
Look, if you're a true believer in X11 I don't think I can convince you otherwise (Koolaid and all).Last edited by vladpetric; 20 May 2020, 04:58 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
Firstly, there are many linux desktops and Secondly -MOST- of them are more stable than Windows. (stable as in it doesn't crash too bad)
From a quality perspective, Windows is a malware trap. Literally tens or hundreds of thousands of windows computers crash or lockup hard requiring a reboot every single day due to malware.
Originally posted by Volta View Post
X was a dead end. What I am seeing is Linux desktop on Wayland, systemd, built around Gtk4. Flatpak needs to mature. However, Atom is java based afaik and maybe that's a culprit.
Atom is based on Electron/Javascript, its got nothing to do with Java. Furthermore a lot of Java apps are highly stable (even though this is off point). Finally Atom is completely stable on platforms other than Linux.
Linux desktop compared to anything comparable is in trash state. Ever since Windows Vista (where Microsoft redid their while graphics/GUI architecture) and from Windows 7 (when the graphics drivers stabilized), Windows has been ultra stable (not a single crash since Windows 7) and the performance of gaming/desktop/GUI is miles ahead of Linux.
I mean come on, Windows is even able to update the graphics driver without rebooting now, try that with Wayland/X11.
Linux desktop stack is still having to deal with immature attitudes when it comes to debating things like GBM/EGL rather than learning from technically superior solutions.Last edited by mdedetrich; 20 May 2020, 05:01 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
I dual boot on Windows (mainly due to gaming) and I haven't gotten a crash in like 7 years. Linux is a different story (of course this depends on your OS/Distro/Kernel that you use).
Comment
Comment