Originally posted by 144Hz
View Post
The original was KDE code so, depending on whether you consider the FLA to be a CLA:
A) If you don't consider the FLA to be a CLA, then the original didn't have a CLA either, so it's nonsensical to bring that up.
B) If you do consider the FLA to be a CLA, then your current statement that it protects Copyleft suggests that your original statement is confused because "no CLA" would be a bad thing in this case.
Leave a comment: