Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vulkan SDK Now Formally Available For Apple Platforms - Including Apple Silicon Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dragon321
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    That is very misleading
    I am glad apple went with Metal wich is cleaner and more performant than Vulkan
    I'm sure you wrote a lot of code in both APIs and can easily provide benchmarks and examples that proves Metal superiority over Vulkan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aryma
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    That is very misleading

    Vulkan is not available on macOS, it is the Emulation Layer that is available, with it comes huge performance cost

    Stop misleading people, this is a problem with open source and "linux" people, their strategies are ugly, they love to mislead people, and they take everything for granted

    I am glad apple went with Metal wich is cleaner and more performant than Vulkan

    Wine and Vulkan are a huge mistake, no wonder why linux usage on steam is stuck bellow 0.7% despite MASSIVE investments
    I'm glad people like use apple
    and I'm not surprised if you like apple like god-like company

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexmitter
    replied
    The bigger issue is that Metal is so limited and backwards that it is hard to even support Vulkan to Metal call translation at all. Metal is more of a restricted Mantel API clone.

    Leave a comment:


  • shmerl
    replied
    The title is a bit misleading. Formally would mean that Apple stopped being a jerk and started supporting Vulkan.

    Leave a comment:


  • nadro
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    That is very misleading
    Vulkan is not available on macOS, it is the Emulation Layer that is available, with it comes huge performance cost
    Stop misleading people, this is a problem with open source and "linux" people, their strategies are ugly, they love to mislead people, and they take everything for granted
    I am glad apple went with Metal wich is cleaner and more performant than Vulkan
    Wine and Vulkan are a huge mistake, no wonder why linux usage on steam is stuck bellow 0.7% despite MASSIVE investments
    Said troll with zero experience with Vulkan and Metal programming, because if you would have some knowledge in this stuff you wouldn't saying this bullshit.

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    That is very misleading

    Vulkan is not available on macOS, it is the Emulation Layer that is available, with it comes huge performance cost

    Stop misleading people, this is a problem with open source and "linux" people, their strategies are ugly, they love to mislead people, and they take everything for granted

    I am glad apple went with Metal wich is cleaner and more performant than Vulkan

    Wine and Vulkan are a huge mistake, no wonder why linux usage on steam is stuck bellow 0.7% despite MASSIVE investments
    Apple fanboy detected.

    Go look at reality for a moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • ermo
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    I am glad apple went with Metal wich is cleaner and more performant than Vulkan
    As someone who is not really into the Apple ecosystem, is there any chance I could persuade you to offer compelling evidence in support of your claim?

    Note that I specifically don't claim that Vulkan is cleaner or more performant than Metal and that I'm willing to consider any and all factual evidence in support of your argument, for example in the form of equivalent benchmarks (including source code) made on the exact same Apple (= Intel + AMD) hardware to the extent that it is possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • kpedersen
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    it is the Emulation Layer that is available, with it comes huge performance cost
    Haha. When it comes to doing things correctly and staying in an open environment... people are more than willing to take that performance hit!

    Do you really think that OpenGL is as successful as it is today because of its performance? No, it is because it works. Vulkan is a DirectX and Metal killer

    Leave a comment:


  • boxie
    replied
    I am looking forward to the day of OpenGL -> Vulkan -> MoltenVK -> Metal and still seeing massive perf increases over the apple openGL implementation

    Leave a comment:


  • stalkerg
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    That is very misleading

    Vulkan is not available on macOS, it is the Emulation Layer that is available, with it comes huge performance cost

    Stop misleading people, this is a problem with open source and "linux" people, their strategies are ugly, they love to mislead people, and they take everything for granted

    I am glad apple went with Metal wich is cleaner and more performant than Vulkan

    Wine and Vulkan are a huge mistake, no wonder why linux usage on steam is stuck bellow 0.7% despite MASSIVE investments
    You are a troll on 100 level and basically, all that you said is lie and I just too lazy to argue with you.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X