If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vulkan Continues To Show Its Gaming Strength On Low-End Hardware
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
In the "New" case: Ryzen 3 1200 quad-core at 3.1GHz (3.4GHz boost)
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
...
There's also the matter of slower system memory with the older tests besides the CPU and other factors. Don't recall off hand either if any of the RADV fixes over the past few weeks would have impacted SS3BFE or if Croteam recently pushed out any game updates (one of my many gripes about having to benchmark with Steam is losing control over version locking). But long story short, there's a lot of hardware/software differences between those results.
That's not AMD's Vulkan driver, that one tested is radv. AMD's official Vulkan driver is called amdvlk and radv is currently outperforming it on several metrics. In fact radv is doing quite well indeed.
There's also the matter of slower system memory with the older tests besides the CPU and other factors. Don't recall off hand either if any of the RADV fixes over the past few weeks would have impacted SS3BFE or if Croteam recently pushed out any game updates (one of my many gripes about having to benchmark with Steam is losing control over version locking). But long story short, there's a lot of hardware/software differences between those results.
I agree.
On the other hand, having the CPU usage plot to compare the 2 set of performance graphs would have been useful to isolate some of the factors.
Is a latest gen quad core CPU, 8GB RAM, 2 x SSD and latest gen >£100 discrete GPU classed as low-end hardware these days? Think I need to upgrade my machine :-/
... or reduce OpenGL performance a bit to make the results more comparable with NVidia's
I have 2 r9 Radeon 280x and I find it odd that the 285 gpu has amdgpu-pro support and the 280x is not listed for Amdgpu-pro.
My cards are supported with the Amd ProRenderer on windows and just curious as to why these cards are not supported with linux Amdgpu-pro driver?
Comment